Sensible Gun Safety

The odds are excellent that you will leave this forum hating someone.
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 32144
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:09 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:01 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:56 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:45 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 5:57 am
PizzaSnake wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 10:00 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:31 pm
PizzaSnake wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 3:32 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 2:56 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 2:47 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 8:36 am
dislaxxic wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 8:03 am
- Under California’s law, private citizens can sue for a minimum of $10,000 per weapon against:

Anyone who manufactures, transports or distributes assault weapons
Licensed dealers who sell firearms to buyers under 21

- The text of the California bill as written in February was tied directly to Texas’ abortion ban. The gun law would become “inoperative” if the Texas abortion law got struck down by the Supreme Court, according to the text.
Time to start prying guns from cold, dead fingers i guess...

..
So who do they sue when your shot by someone carrying an ILLEGAL WEAPON?? So the text of the California Bill is " tied directly" to the Texas abortion bill? Isn't that an issue for a judge to decide?? :roll:
The manufacturer. I have said it for years. Expose them to civil liability. If the weapon was stolen, file a lawsuit against the person that didn't lock it up properly. If you find the trafficker, throw the book at them along with the person caught with an illegal weapon.
The gun manufacturers should not be held liable for the stupidity of the people that buy their product. They manufactured a product that did what it was designed to do. I'm all for throwing the book at people who traffic in illegal weapons. I'm even more in favor of throwing the book at anyone cought in possession of an illegal firearm. When the powers that be in government turn their attention to this issue it will be a very good day.
And manufacturers who build components provided to deliberately avoid tracing and accountability, i.e. ghost guns? What is their intent and what should be done?
Apples to oranges comparison. The folks manufacturing parts for ghost guns should be held accountable and their products should be banned. FTR my son built one of his AR-15 rifles from a kit he purchased on line. I don't know if the parts have serial numbers. I don't believe they do. If it matters he is a federal law enforcement officer. It may be easier for him to purchase these kits.
And those (your son) who purchase these untraceable, unregulated firearms? What is his intent? Why not buy a fully assembled, more traceable and regulable firearm?

Ask him and get back to us. If you are going to assert authenticity and relevance due to proximity, then exercise it. Otherwise, who cares what your progeny is doing?

Every person, reviled or esteemed, has parents.
Easy answer he built his rifle around 7 years ago. The kit rifles allow you to customize your rifle to your own specs. Building kit rifles was not all that controversial 7 years ago. The fact my son is a FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENT gives him a bit of a justification for choosing to build his own rifle. FTR the vast majority of federal agents have done the same thing. These rifles are very popular with law enforcement because they can customize them to their specific needs. FTR nothing he did was illegal or unethical. Law enforcement are generally very particular about the weapons they use to protect themselves. It is very similar to why your auto mechanic uses tools from Snap On or Mac instead of buying them from Harbor Freight. Also FTR he purchased his kit rifle from a licensed FF dealer who deals strictly with law enforcement. If that bothers you then that is your problem.
The employer doesn’t give them what they need? Soldiers also buying ghost guns because they get latitude?

BTW, you used the word “May” earlier…..
What has what soldiers buying have anything to do with this conversation??? I'm discussing what local law enforcement and federal law enforcement are doing. There is an oft used expression among many people in law enforcement... it is better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. Roll that around in your cranium for awhile and see if you can figure out what it means?? Break time is over... you need to get your ass back to work and help pay for my socialist benefits. :D
Just an example of how an employer makes sure the employees have what “they need”. Use your thinking cap.
The employer has diddly jack squat to do with what weapons their employees like and dislike. why don't you take your own advice and use your thinking cap?? Why do you think so many local and federal law enforcement agents pay their own money to build a weapon suitable to their own preferences??? My son and many other members of law enforcement paid money out of pocket to design the AR 15 weapons they are comfortable with. Go back to work, i need you working to support me and not blathering on about stuff that is way out of your wheelhouse. :D
You seemed to relate the purchase to your son’s job. You are the one that mentioned his job in the context of his assault rifle purchase.
“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 13841
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by cradleandshoot »

Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:19 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:09 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:01 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:56 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:45 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 5:57 am
PizzaSnake wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 10:00 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:31 pm
PizzaSnake wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 3:32 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 2:56 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 2:47 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 8:36 am
dislaxxic wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 8:03 am
- Under California’s law, private citizens can sue for a minimum of $10,000 per weapon against:

Anyone who manufactures, transports or distributes assault weapons
Licensed dealers who sell firearms to buyers under 21

- The text of the California bill as written in February was tied directly to Texas’ abortion ban. The gun law would become “inoperative” if the Texas abortion law got struck down by the Supreme Court, according to the text.
Time to start prying guns from cold, dead fingers i guess...

..
So who do they sue when your shot by someone carrying an ILLEGAL WEAPON?? So the text of the California Bill is " tied directly" to the Texas abortion bill? Isn't that an issue for a judge to decide?? :roll:
The manufacturer. I have said it for years. Expose them to civil liability. If the weapon was stolen, file a lawsuit against the person that didn't lock it up properly. If you find the trafficker, throw the book at them along with the person caught with an illegal weapon.
The gun manufacturers should not be held liable for the stupidity of the people that buy their product. They manufactured a product that did what it was designed to do. I'm all for throwing the book at people who traffic in illegal weapons. I'm even more in favor of throwing the book at anyone cought in possession of an illegal firearm. When the powers that be in government turn their attention to this issue it will be a very good day.
And manufacturers who build components provided to deliberately avoid tracing and accountability, i.e. ghost guns? What is their intent and what should be done?
Apples to oranges comparison. The folks manufacturing parts for ghost guns should be held accountable and their products should be banned. FTR my son built one of his AR-15 rifles from a kit he purchased on line. I don't know if the parts have serial numbers. I don't believe they do. If it matters he is a federal law enforcement officer. It may be easier for him to purchase these kits.
And those (your son) who purchase these untraceable, unregulated firearms? What is his intent? Why not buy a fully assembled, more traceable and regulable firearm?

Ask him and get back to us. If you are going to assert authenticity and relevance due to proximity, then exercise it. Otherwise, who cares what your progeny is doing?

Every person, reviled or esteemed, has parents.
Easy answer he built his rifle around 7 years ago. The kit rifles allow you to customize your rifle to your own specs. Building kit rifles was not all that controversial 7 years ago. The fact my son is a FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENT gives him a bit of a justification for choosing to build his own rifle. FTR the vast majority of federal agents have done the same thing. These rifles are very popular with law enforcement because they can customize them to their specific needs. FTR nothing he did was illegal or unethical. Law enforcement are generally very particular about the weapons they use to protect themselves. It is very similar to why your auto mechanic uses tools from Snap On or Mac instead of buying them from Harbor Freight. Also FTR he purchased his kit rifle from a licensed FF dealer who deals strictly with law enforcement. If that bothers you then that is your problem.
The employer doesn’t give them what they need? Soldiers also buying ghost guns because they get latitude?

BTW, you used the word “May” earlier…..
What has what soldiers buying have anything to do with this conversation??? I'm discussing what local law enforcement and federal law enforcement are doing. There is an oft used expression among many people in law enforcement... it is better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. Roll that around in your cranium for awhile and see if you can figure out what it means?? Break time is over... you need to get your ass back to work and help pay for my socialist benefits. :D
Just an example of how an employer makes sure the employees have what “they need”. Use your thinking cap.
The employer has diddly jack squat to do with what weapons their employees like and dislike. why don't you take your own advice and use your thinking cap?? Why do you think so many local and federal law enforcement agents pay their own money to build a weapon suitable to their own preferences??? My son and many other members of law enforcement paid money out of pocket to design the AR 15 weapons they are comfortable with. Go back to work, i need you working to support me and not blathering on about stuff that is way out of your wheelhouse. :D
You seemed to relate the purchase to your son’s job. You are the one that mentioned his job in the context of his assault rifle purchase.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6tkykkg7TY

Yes I did, he was also the firearm instructor for FAM shooters training at Atlantic City. My son was awarded the triple nickel. My son is an elite weapons expert who is one of the best shots with a handgun in law enforcement. You have a problem with him building his own weapon??? I'm mother effing proud of my son, he has been willing to sacrifice his life to defend our country. Tell me why you want to insult him and his experience in law enforcement?? Go back to work, i need you to pay for my SS.. BTW, my sons triple nickel time was 3.8 seconds, one of the best times ever from a FAM.
Last edited by cradleandshoot on Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
I use to be a people person until people ruined that for me.
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 32144
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:28 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:19 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:09 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:01 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:56 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:45 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 5:57 am
PizzaSnake wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 10:00 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:31 pm
PizzaSnake wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 3:32 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 2:56 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 2:47 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 8:36 am
dislaxxic wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 8:03 am
- Under California’s law, private citizens can sue for a minimum of $10,000 per weapon against:

Anyone who manufactures, transports or distributes assault weapons
Licensed dealers who sell firearms to buyers under 21

- The text of the California bill as written in February was tied directly to Texas’ abortion ban. The gun law would become “inoperative” if the Texas abortion law got struck down by the Supreme Court, according to the text.
Time to start prying guns from cold, dead fingers i guess...

..
So who do they sue when your shot by someone carrying an ILLEGAL WEAPON?? So the text of the California Bill is " tied directly" to the Texas abortion bill? Isn't that an issue for a judge to decide?? :roll:
The manufacturer. I have said it for years. Expose them to civil liability. If the weapon was stolen, file a lawsuit against the person that didn't lock it up properly. If you find the trafficker, throw the book at them along with the person caught with an illegal weapon.
The gun manufacturers should not be held liable for the stupidity of the people that buy their product. They manufactured a product that did what it was designed to do. I'm all for throwing the book at people who traffic in illegal weapons. I'm even more in favor of throwing the book at anyone cought in possession of an illegal firearm. When the powers that be in government turn their attention to this issue it will be a very good day.
And manufacturers who build components provided to deliberately avoid tracing and accountability, i.e. ghost guns? What is their intent and what should be done?
Apples to oranges comparison. The folks manufacturing parts for ghost guns should be held accountable and their products should be banned. FTR my son built one of his AR-15 rifles from a kit he purchased on line. I don't know if the parts have serial numbers. I don't believe they do. If it matters he is a federal law enforcement officer. It may be easier for him to purchase these kits.
And those (your son) who purchase these untraceable, unregulated firearms? What is his intent? Why not buy a fully assembled, more traceable and regulable firearm?

Ask him and get back to us. If you are going to assert authenticity and relevance due to proximity, then exercise it. Otherwise, who cares what your progeny is doing?

Every person, reviled or esteemed, has parents.
Easy answer he built his rifle around 7 years ago. The kit rifles allow you to customize your rifle to your own specs. Building kit rifles was not all that controversial 7 years ago. The fact my son is a FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENT gives him a bit of a justification for choosing to build his own rifle. FTR the vast majority of federal agents have done the same thing. These rifles are very popular with law enforcement because they can customize them to their specific needs. FTR nothing he did was illegal or unethical. Law enforcement are generally very particular about the weapons they use to protect themselves. It is very similar to why your auto mechanic uses tools from Snap On or Mac instead of buying them from Harbor Freight. Also FTR he purchased his kit rifle from a licensed FF dealer who deals strictly with law enforcement. If that bothers you then that is your problem.
The employer doesn’t give them what they need? Soldiers also buying ghost guns because they get latitude?

BTW, you used the word “May” earlier…..
What has what soldiers buying have anything to do with this conversation??? I'm discussing what local law enforcement and federal law enforcement are doing. There is an oft used expression among many people in law enforcement... it is better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. Roll that around in your cranium for awhile and see if you can figure out what it means?? Break time is over... you need to get your ass back to work and help pay for my socialist benefits. :D
Just an example of how an employer makes sure the employees have what “they need”. Use your thinking cap.
The employer has diddly jack squat to do with what weapons their employees like and dislike. why don't you take your own advice and use your thinking cap?? Why do you think so many local and federal law enforcement agents pay their own money to build a weapon suitable to their own preferences??? My son and many other members of law enforcement paid money out of pocket to design the AR 15 weapons they are comfortable with. Go back to work, i need you working to support me and not blathering on about stuff that is way out of your wheelhouse. :D
You seemed to relate the purchase to your son’s job. You are the one that mentioned his job in the context of his assault rifle purchase.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6tkykkg7TY

Yes I did, he was also the firearm instructor for FAM shooters training at Atlantic City. My son was awarded the triple nickel. My son is an elite weapons expert who is one of the best shots with a handgun in law enforcement. You have a problem with him building his own weapon??? I'm mother effing proud of my son, he has been willing to sacrifice his life to defend our country. Tell me why you want to insult him and his experience in law enforcement?? Go back to work, i need you to pay for my SS..
You are delusional.
“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 13841
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by cradleandshoot »

Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:35 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:28 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:19 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:09 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 11:01 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 10:56 am
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 9:45 am
cradleandshoot wrote: Tue Jul 26, 2022 5:57 am
PizzaSnake wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 10:00 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:31 pm
PizzaSnake wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 3:32 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 2:56 pm
Typical Lax Dad wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 2:47 pm
cradleandshoot wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 8:36 am
dislaxxic wrote: Mon Jul 25, 2022 8:03 am
- Under California’s law, private citizens can sue for a minimum of $10,000 per weapon against:

Anyone who manufactures, transports or distributes assault weapons
Licensed dealers who sell firearms to buyers under 21

- The text of the California bill as written in February was tied directly to Texas’ abortion ban. The gun law would become “inoperative” if the Texas abortion law got struck down by the Supreme Court, according to the text.
Time to start prying guns from cold, dead fingers i guess...

..
So who do they sue when your shot by someone carrying an ILLEGAL WEAPON?? So the text of the California Bill is " tied directly" to the Texas abortion bill? Isn't that an issue for a judge to decide?? :roll:
The manufacturer. I have said it for years. Expose them to civil liability. If the weapon was stolen, file a lawsuit against the person that didn't lock it up properly. If you find the trafficker, throw the book at them along with the person caught with an illegal weapon.
The gun manufacturers should not be held liable for the stupidity of the people that buy their product. They manufactured a product that did what it was designed to do. I'm all for throwing the book at people who traffic in illegal weapons. I'm even more in favor of throwing the book at anyone cought in possession of an illegal firearm. When the powers that be in government turn their attention to this issue it will be a very good day.
And manufacturers who build components provided to deliberately avoid tracing and accountability, i.e. ghost guns? What is their intent and what should be done?
Apples to oranges comparison. The folks manufacturing parts for ghost guns should be held accountable and their products should be banned. FTR my son built one of his AR-15 rifles from a kit he purchased on line. I don't know if the parts have serial numbers. I don't believe they do. If it matters he is a federal law enforcement officer. It may be easier for him to purchase these kits.
And those (your son) who purchase these untraceable, unregulated firearms? What is his intent? Why not buy a fully assembled, more traceable and regulable firearm?

Ask him and get back to us. If you are going to assert authenticity and relevance due to proximity, then exercise it. Otherwise, who cares what your progeny is doing?

Every person, reviled or esteemed, has parents.
Easy answer he built his rifle around 7 years ago. The kit rifles allow you to customize your rifle to your own specs. Building kit rifles was not all that controversial 7 years ago. The fact my son is a FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENT gives him a bit of a justification for choosing to build his own rifle. FTR the vast majority of federal agents have done the same thing. These rifles are very popular with law enforcement because they can customize them to their specific needs. FTR nothing he did was illegal or unethical. Law enforcement are generally very particular about the weapons they use to protect themselves. It is very similar to why your auto mechanic uses tools from Snap On or Mac instead of buying them from Harbor Freight. Also FTR he purchased his kit rifle from a licensed FF dealer who deals strictly with law enforcement. If that bothers you then that is your problem.
The employer doesn’t give them what they need? Soldiers also buying ghost guns because they get latitude?

BTW, you used the word “May” earlier…..
What has what soldiers buying have anything to do with this conversation??? I'm discussing what local law enforcement and federal law enforcement are doing. There is an oft used expression among many people in law enforcement... it is better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. Roll that around in your cranium for awhile and see if you can figure out what it means?? Break time is over... you need to get your ass back to work and help pay for my socialist benefits. :D
Just an example of how an employer makes sure the employees have what “they need”. Use your thinking cap.
The employer has diddly jack squat to do with what weapons their employees like and dislike. why don't you take your own advice and use your thinking cap?? Why do you think so many local and federal law enforcement agents pay their own money to build a weapon suitable to their own preferences??? My son and many other members of law enforcement paid money out of pocket to design the AR 15 weapons they are comfortable with. Go back to work, i need you working to support me and not blathering on about stuff that is way out of your wheelhouse. :D
You seemed to relate the purchase to your son’s job. You are the one that mentioned his job in the context of his assault rifle purchase.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6tkykkg7TY

Yes I did, he was also the firearm instructor for FAM shooters training at Atlantic City. My son was awarded the triple nickel. My son is an elite weapons expert who is one of the best shots with a handgun in law enforcement. You have a problem with him building his own weapon??? I'm mother effing proud of my son, he has been willing to sacrifice his life to defend our country. Tell me why you want to insult him and his experience in law enforcement?? Go back to work, i need you to pay for my SS..
You are delusional.
How so, do you resent paying for my social security??? Go back to work.. :lol:
I use to be a people person until people ruined that for me.
CU88
Posts: 4431
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by CU88 »

Why doesn't this happen with every Mass Shooting?

The Uvalde City Council vowed Tuesday to investigate every city police officer who responded to the massacre at the Robb Elementary School in May.

"This investigation is looking at every single officer and what his actions -- what he did, what our policy says -- and basically, we're gonna get a report on everybody," council member Ernest "Chip" King III said, adding, "we will act on it, and we promise that to you."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/26/us/uvald ... index.html
User avatar
youthathletics
Posts: 14443
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 7:36 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by youthathletics »

CU88 wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:38 am Why doesn't this happen with every Mass Shooting?

The Uvalde City Council vowed Tuesday to investigate every city police officer who responded to the massacre at the Robb Elementary School in May.

"This investigation is looking at every single officer and what his actions -- what he did, what our policy says -- and basically, we're gonna get a report on everybody," council member Ernest "Chip" King III said, adding, "we will act on it, and we promise that to you."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/26/us/uvald ... index.html
It is quite simple....there is a leadership problem by poor managers: https://www.instagram.com/p/CgejRuxL2L8/
A fraudulent intent, however carefully concealed at the outset, will generally, in the end, betray itself.
~Livy
CU88
Posts: 4431
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by CU88 »

youthathletics wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 8:03 am
CU88 wrote: Wed Jul 27, 2022 7:38 am Why doesn't this happen with every Mass Shooting?

The Uvalde City Council vowed Tuesday to investigate every city police officer who responded to the massacre at the Robb Elementary School in May.

"This investigation is looking at every single officer and what his actions -- what he did, what our policy says -- and basically, we're gonna get a report on everybody," council member Ernest "Chip" King III said, adding, "we will act on it, and we promise that to you."

https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/26/us/uvald ... index.html
It is quite simple....there is a leadership problem by poor managers: https://www.instagram.com/p/CgejRuxL2L8/
+1

Does anyone have a website that tracks lawsuit financial settlement costs for each police department?
User avatar
NattyBohChamps04
Posts: 2202
Joined: Tue May 04, 2021 11:40 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by NattyBohChamps04 »

Not a bad post other than blaming Liberals for police incompetence and crime spikes nationwide in the last slide. And the terrible steps labeled 1 and 2 to prevent another Uvalde.

Reeks of "I don't take responsibility at all"
DMac
Posts: 8762
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by DMac »

Uh oh, I better hurry up and open this, looks like they're coming to get my gun.
Have never been a member of the NRA.
Image
User avatar
cradleandshoot
Posts: 13841
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2018 4:42 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by cradleandshoot »

DMac wrote: Tue Aug 02, 2022 11:28 am Uh oh, I better hurry up and open this, looks like they're coming to get my gun.
Have never been a member of the NRA.
Image
At least they sent you free rolling papers.. unless you doctored the picture.😜. I always pictured you as a zig zag guy.
I use to be a people person until people ruined that for me.
DMac
Posts: 8762
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by DMac »

Gotta love this guy. Got himself in a good spot bein' a lefty shooter.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/se ... ac5d5c0b8a
Typical Lax Dad
Posts: 32144
Joined: Mon Jul 30, 2018 12:10 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by Typical Lax Dad »

“You lucky I ain’t read wretched yet!”
PizzaSnake
Posts: 4691
Joined: Tue Mar 05, 2019 8:36 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by PizzaSnake »

‘Murican scourge of “small-dcik” man is spreading…

Our new top export: stupidity.

Tawt probably joined LE because he was a coward and used a gun when he most certainly was going to get his asz kicked.

“Social media posts suggest Lo’s alleged killer, who was arrested after handing himself into police on Sunday night, was a die-hard gun aficionado.

“Firearms abolish the tyranny of the strongest and protect the integrity of the weakest,” he wrote on Instagram recently alongside a photograph of him posing with a revolver at a shooting range.”

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/ ... d-shooting
"There is nothing more difficult and more dangerous to carry through than initiating changes. One makes enemies of those who prospered under the old order, and only lukewarm support from those who would prosper under the new."
ardilla secreta
Posts: 2095
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:32 am
Location: Niagara Frontier

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by ardilla secreta »

DMac wrote: Tue Aug 02, 2022 11:28 am Uh oh, I better hurry up and open this, looks like they're coming to get my gun.
Have never been a member of the NRA.
Image
Interesting that the NRA is using the same tactics as home and car warranty scammers are using. I just got a last notice that the home warranty that I don’t have is running out.
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 22325
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by Farfromgeneva »

ardilla secreta wrote: Mon Aug 08, 2022 4:17 pm
DMac wrote: Tue Aug 02, 2022 11:28 am Uh oh, I better hurry up and open this, looks like they're coming to get my gun.
Have never been a member of the NRA.
Image
Interesting that the NRA is using the same tactics as home and car warranty scammers are using. I just got a last notice that the home warranty that I don’t have is running out.
And magazine subscriptions. The day after subscribing or renewing time is running out to renew!
Same sword they knight you they gon' good night you with
Thats' only half if they like you
That ain't even the half what they might do
Don't believe me, ask Michael
See Martin, Malcolm
See Jesus, Judas; Caesar, Brutus
See success is like suicide
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6211
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by kramerica.inc »

At least 53 people shot, 7 fatally, in weekend shootings across Chicago.
LaxFan2000
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:51 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by LaxFan2000 »

kramerica.inc wrote: Tue Aug 09, 2022 8:38 am At least 53 people shot, 7 fatally, in weekend shootings across Chicago.
Kram,

That's terrible, but nobody on this site seems to be concerned about that, at least from what I have seen in a few months on this thread. A shame.
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 22325
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by Farfromgeneva »

Where’s the stooped laughing emoji folks like to overuse so much??

This is total BS fraud.
Same sword they knight you they gon' good night you with
Thats' only half if they like you
That ain't even the half what they might do
Don't believe me, ask Michael
See Martin, Malcolm
See Jesus, Judas; Caesar, Brutus
See success is like suicide
LaxFan2000
Posts: 198
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2022 1:51 pm

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by LaxFan2000 »

Farfromgeneva wrote: Tue Aug 09, 2022 11:57 am Where’s the stooped laughing emoji folks like to overuse so much??

This is total BS fraud.
If you are talking about your response, then yes it is correct. Keep seeking out that one poster that you don't like and belittling his every post. Everybody can see you do that with Cradle. What did he do to you to make you get so worked up every single time he posts? must have been bad from your view.
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 22325
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: Sensible Gun Safety

Post by Farfromgeneva »

LaxFan2000 wrote: Tue Aug 09, 2022 12:04 pm
Farfromgeneva wrote: Tue Aug 09, 2022 11:57 am Where’s the stooped laughing emoji folks like to overuse so much??

This is total BS fraud.
If you are talking about your response, then yes it is correct. Keep seeking out that one poster that you don't like and belittling his every post. Everybody can see you do that with Cradle. What did he do to you to make you get so worked up every single time he posts? must have been bad from your view.
You have no idea what your talking about and keep making claims that are wrong. Enjoy being wrong and wrong with conviction.
Same sword they knight you they gon' good night you with
Thats' only half if they like you
That ain't even the half what they might do
Don't believe me, ask Michael
See Martin, Malcolm
See Jesus, Judas; Caesar, Brutus
See success is like suicide
Post Reply

Return to “POLITICS”