Am I allowed to make the threads for weeks 2/3/4/5/6/7/8? If so I’ll make them tomorrow and that should end the confusion for everyone I think if I just press new topic that should do it and I will fill the games in etc
I literally only just spotted that I could do this and not just admin or I’d have done it sooner
2019 - Week One
Re: 2019 - Week One
So, question Admin, if I want to start Jacob Kelly in week 10 I have to declare this prior to the UNC Harvard game this Saturday?
Re: 2019 - Week One
Re: 2019 - Week One
You're fine. It just needs to be 3 Ms and 3 As. Which you have. This is what i have for your players and positions. A zero next to a players name means he's a starter.
NJLaxx11 -
Brendan Gleason A SR Notre Dame 0
Nick Garofano SO A Army -
Philip Robertson JR A Princeton 0
Grant Maloof SR M Towson 0
Robert Clark SR A Georgetown -
Jake Moss FR M Notre Dame -
Reilly Walsh M JR Duke 0
Brad Smith SR M Duke 0
PJ Brown SR M Loyola -
Nick Bond FR M Princeton -
William Clayton FR M Denver -
Mitch Howell JR A UMBC 0
John Geppert FR M UMD -
Denver D 0
NJLaxx11 -
Brendan Gleason A SR Notre Dame 0
Nick Garofano SO A Army -
Philip Robertson JR A Princeton 0
Grant Maloof SR M Towson 0
Robert Clark SR A Georgetown -
Jake Moss FR M Notre Dame -
Reilly Walsh M JR Duke 0
Brad Smith SR M Duke 0
PJ Brown SR M Loyola -
Nick Bond FR M Princeton -
William Clayton FR M Denver -
Mitch Howell JR A UMBC 0
John Geppert FR M UMD -
Denver D 0
Re: 2019 - Week One
weeks 2-8 and now up and available to post your rosters.. being too british i enjoy a fair game and want everyone to be able to post their starters properly and not lose out on confusion terms
Re: 2019 - Week One
Seems a little accusatory. UK, im trying to give you the benefit if the doubt but i'm struggling a little. How is this unfair and improper?
Starting a player has three components. The date of their NCAA game, who is their NCAA team playing, and what Fantasy Week are the two aforementioned factors. This basically boils down to, Is he injured on the relevant date? Is his opponent tough or weak? and what are my other starter options? All this information is 100% accessible to every coach. Injured, etc. ... NCAA Games that Count Chronologically, Who is his opponent... Same. NCAA Games that Count Chronologically, and What are my options... NCAA Games that Count by Fantasy Week. Your point is, I want to set my line-up for every week now and then I can look at the Chronological list and make changes if someone's injured. Fantasy Week first, Chronology second. My question is, How is Chronology first, Fantasy Week second, unfair and improper?
Starting a player has three components. The date of their NCAA game, who is their NCAA team playing, and what Fantasy Week are the two aforementioned factors. This basically boils down to, Is he injured on the relevant date? Is his opponent tough or weak? and what are my other starter options? All this information is 100% accessible to every coach. Injured, etc. ... NCAA Games that Count Chronologically, Who is his opponent... Same. NCAA Games that Count Chronologically, and What are my options... NCAA Games that Count by Fantasy Week. Your point is, I want to set my line-up for every week now and then I can look at the Chronological list and make changes if someone's injured. Fantasy Week first, Chronology second. My question is, How is Chronology first, Fantasy Week second, unfair and improper?
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2018 3:54 pm
Re: 2019 - Week One
Both Gleason and Walsh Midfielders. So that's 4 middies 2 attack.admin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:09 am You're fine. It just needs to be 3 Ms and 3 As. Which you have. This is what i have for your players and positions. A zero next to a players name means he's a starter.
NJLaxx11 -
Brendan Gleason A SR Notre Dame 0
Nick Garofano SO A Army -
Philip Robertson JR A Princeton 0
Grant Maloof SR M Towson 0
Robert Clark SR A Georgetown -
Jake Moss FR M Notre Dame -
Reilly Walsh M JR Duke 0
Brad Smith SR M Duke 0
PJ Brown SR M Loyola -
Nick Bond FR M Princeton -
William Clayton FR M Denver -
Mitch Howell JR A UMBC 0
John Geppert FR M UMD -
Denver D 0
Re: 2019 - Week One
Oh I didn’t mean this as an accusation at anyone, especially not you... sorry it felt that way.. I only meant fair between players so that someone can’t say “oh I missed this game by accident, I feel denied that I’m missing this persons points” If they meant to have joe blogs play this week but didn’t have him set so misses out on his points etc... I didn’t mean you weren’t creating a fair game haha!admin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:13 am Seems a little accusatory. UK, im trying to give you the benefit if the doubt but i'm struggling a little. How is this unfair and improper?
Starting a player has three components. The date of their NCAA game, who is their NCAA team playing, and what Fantasy Week are the two aforementioned factors. This basically boils down to, Is he injured on the relevant date? Is his opponent tough or weak? and what are my other starter options? All this information is 100% accessible to every coach. Injured, etc. ... NCAA Games that Count Chronologically, Who is his opponent... Same. NCAA Games that Count Chronologically, and What are my options... NCAA Games that Count by Fantasy Week. Your point is, I want to set my line-up for every week now and then I can look at the Chronological list and make changes if someone's injured. Fantasy Week first, Chronology second. My question is, How is Chronology first, Fantasy Week second, unfair and improper?
I just know somewhere down the line someone would be like “I start Joe blogs this week” and their game had already happened, they had scored 5 points and then people argue over whether they were set or not.. this way there can be no ambiguity ... I definitely didn’t mean it in a negative way
Re: 2019 - Week One
And also I was making a joke about the BritishUklax wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:01 pmOh I didn’t mean this as an accusation at anyone, especially not you... sorry it felt that way.. I only meant fair between players so that someone can’t say “oh I missed this game by accident, I feel denied that I’m missing this persons points” If they meant to have joe blogs play this week but didn’t have him set so misses out on his points etc... I didn’t mean you weren’t creating a fair game haha!admin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:13 am Seems a little accusatory. UK, im trying to give you the benefit if the doubt but i'm struggling a little. How is this unfair and improper?
Starting a player has three components. The date of their NCAA game, who is their NCAA team playing, and what Fantasy Week are the two aforementioned factors. This basically boils down to, Is he injured on the relevant date? Is his opponent tough or weak? and what are my other starter options? All this information is 100% accessible to every coach. Injured, etc. ... NCAA Games that Count Chronologically, Who is his opponent... Same. NCAA Games that Count Chronologically, and What are my options... NCAA Games that Count by Fantasy Week. Your point is, I want to set my line-up for every week now and then I can look at the Chronological list and make changes if someone's injured. Fantasy Week first, Chronology second. My question is, How is Chronology first, Fantasy Week second, unfair and improper?
I just know somewhere down the line someone would be like “I start Joe blogs this week” and their game had already happened, they had scored 5 points and then people argue over whether they were set or not.. this way there can be no ambiguity ... I definitely didn’t mean it in a negative way
Re: 2019 - Week One
And also I know I would be the person that messed it up...again let me emphasis I wasn’t trying to accuse you of anythingadmin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 9:13 am Seems a little accusatory. UK, im trying to give you the benefit if the doubt but i'm struggling a little. How is this unfair and improper?
Starting a player has three components. The date of their NCAA game, who is their NCAA team playing, and what Fantasy Week are the two aforementioned factors. This basically boils down to, Is he injured on the relevant date? Is his opponent tough or weak? and what are my other starter options? All this information is 100% accessible to every coach. Injured, etc. ... NCAA Games that Count Chronologically, Who is his opponent... Same. NCAA Games that Count Chronologically, and What are my options... NCAA Games that Count by Fantasy Week. Your point is, I want to set my line-up for every week now and then I can look at the Chronological list and make changes if someone's injured. Fantasy Week first, Chronology second. My question is, How is Chronology first, Fantasy Week second, unfair and improper?
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2018 3:28 pm
Re: 2019 - Week One
new line up:
A - Rehfuss
A - Wisnauskus
A - Walker
M - Jasinski
M - Donville
M - Sullivan
D - Princeton
Jasinski and Sullivan both listed as Middies on roster. Ellis Geis (3 goals in FR debut w/ Denver) also listed as a middie.
A - Rehfuss
A - Wisnauskus
A - Walker
M - Jasinski
M - Donville
M - Sullivan
D - Princeton
Jasinski and Sullivan both listed as Middies on roster. Ellis Geis (3 goals in FR debut w/ Denver) also listed as a middie.
Re: 2019 - Week One
gcclaxster67 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 11:23 amBoth Gleason and Walsh Midfielders. So that's 4 middies 2 attack.admin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 12:09 am You're fine. It just needs to be 3 Ms and 3 As. Which you have. This is what i have for your players and positions. A zero next to a players name means he's a starter.
NJLaxx11 -
Brendan Gleason A SR Notre Dame 0
Nick Garofano SO A Army -
Philip Robertson JR A Princeton 0
Grant Maloof SR M Towson 0
Robert Clark SR A Georgetown -
Jake Moss FR M Notre Dame -
Reilly Walsh M JR Duke 0
Brad Smith SR M Duke 0
PJ Brown SR M Loyola -
Nick Bond FR M Princeton -
William Clayton FR M Denver -
Mitch Howell JR A UMBC 0
John Geppert FR M UMD -
Denver D 0
So we don’t go by official team rosters? I feel like I’m doing the right thing here but if we want to assign positions to players that doesn’t make much sense to me.
Re: 2019 - Week One
NJ, you're not alone. In more than one season, the position designations have been a point of contention. But not in many years. (e.g. Jeff Froccaro was an A. 100% an A... and he scored goals. And... He started taking face-offs. Face-off win, he stays. face-off lose, he runs off the field. Not simple. ) with that said, our rule is that we go by the website until a game is played. Then we go by the box score and/or our eyeballs. But, before changing a player's designation on your roster, make sure to put it before the other coaches. e.g. "Gleason is playing on the first middy line. I think he's an M." Along the same lines, but separately, with an NCAA M playing Fantasy A, we're looser. he does need to be an M but when there's a question, we lean towards, it's OK. With an NCAA A playing a Fantasy M, with that we're stricter. We want to avoid any Fantasy team having 4 attackmen.
Re: 2019 - Week One
Look at the NCAA Games that Count. This weekend, 2 of the games count for Week One, Denver and UMBC. You don't have UMBC players and French is on your bench so... You won't accrue any points.
UK, there's only one way to be clear with me. Take a look at the NCAA Games that Count. (They're organized by Fantasy Week as well as Chronologically. You have all the info you need.) Then post your starters in a post within the thread we're currently hanging out in. Currently, that thread is Week One. Which is great because this is the Week One thread and your starters are above. We're all set. But wait. On 2/9 when PSU played, Foulds was one of your starters. He's a starter and... You don't want his points. On Saturday, there's a bunch more games that count. One of those games is Rutgers and you have Mullins starting and... You also don't want those Points. UK, If you don't want any Points, put everyone on your bench. If you want a player's points to count, start the player before the game. Put everyone on your bench and then, if you want your player Sunday's Points to count during his game on 2/15, take him off your bench before the game starts and start him... in the thread we're all hanging out in. That's the system. A line-up like you did above is fine. "Put in Frank, take out N'Beans" is fine. A post with starters and then other verbiage saying, I don't want X for Week 3 but I do want Y for Week etc. is not fine. submit your starter(s) pre-game in the thread we're hanging out in.My current team is
Mullins
Foulds
Carraway
Sunday
Wittenberg
Beckwith
Hofstra D
But I don’t want Mullins fixture for week 2 or foulds for week 4 so don’t count their points if they play those gameweek fixtures before they play their week 1 fixtures.. I’ve tried to make that as clear as I can... If any of this doesn’t make sense just message me and I’ll try to clarify better.
Re: 2019 - Week One
admin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:54 pm NJ, you're not alone. In more than one season, the position designations have been a point of contention. But not in many years. (e.g. Jeff Froccaro was an A. 100% an A... and he scored goals. And... He started taking face-offs. Face-off win, he stays. face-off lose, he runs off the field. Not simple. ) with that said, our rule is that we go by the website until a game is played. Then we go by the box score and/or our eyeballs. But, before changing a player's designation on your roster, make sure to put it before the other coaches. e.g. "Gleason is playing on the first middy line. I think he's an M." Along the same lines, but separately, with an NCAA M playing Fantasy A, we're looser. he does need to be an M but when there's a question, we lean towards, it's OK. With an NCAA A playing a Fantasy M, with that we're stricter. We want to avoid any Fantasy team having 4 attackmen.
Got it - so looking at the last duke box score, brad smith started at attack and Walsh at middie. So I’ll just flip them for now!
Re: 2019 - Week One
Alright I’ll try to make sure I do it right then from now on? Sorry I didn’t figure it out right..Start a fresh... just delete the other threads then, I dunno how to remove them just individual posts.. I’m sure with admin rights you’ll be able toadmin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 4:17 pm
Look at the NCAA Games that Count. This weekend, 2 of the games count for Week One, Denver and UMBC. You don't have UMBC players and French is on your bench so... You won't accrue any points.
UK, there's only one way to be clear with me. Take a look at the NCAA Games that Count. (They're organized by Fantasy Week as well as Chronologically. You have all the info you need.) Then post your starters in a post within the thread we're currently hanging out in. Currently, that thread is Week One. Which is great because this is the Week One thread and your starters are above. We're all set. But wait. On 2/9 when PSU played, Foulds was one of your starters. He's a starter and... You don't want his points. On Saturday, there's a bunch more games that count. One of those games is Rutgers and you have Mullins starting and... You also don't want those Points. UK, If you don't want any Points, put everyone on your bench. If you want a player's points to count, start the player before the game. Put everyone on your bench and then, if you want your player Sunday's Points to count during his game on 2/15, take him off your bench before the game starts and start him... in the thread we're all hanging out in. That's the system. A line-up like you did above is fine. "Put in Frank, take out N'Beans" is fine. A post with starters and then other verbiage saying, I don't want X for Week 3 but I do want Y for Week etc. is not fine. submit your starter(s) pre-game in the thread we're hanging out in.My current team is
Mullins
Foulds
Carraway
Sunday
Wittenberg
Beckwith
Hofstra D
But I don’t want Mullins fixture for week 2 or foulds for week 4 so don’t count their points if they play those gameweek fixtures before they play their week 1 fixtures.. I’ve tried to make that as clear as I can... If any of this doesn’t make sense just message me and I’ll try to clarify better.
So to make it clear for my own understanding... Foulds has played for me 2/9 then regardless cause I had him in at the time in this thread and we are just ignoring my long list because it was an incorrect way to post? So for that week I’ll just pick two more attackers and can’t remove him yeah as that time has past?
So hopefully I get this right then and if not oh well I tried..
Current starters then and ill just leave it as this..
Carraway
Mullins
Foulds
Sunday
Wittenberg
Beckwith
Hof D
Because I know French is out for the 16th so bench
Re: 2019 - Week One
This reference stings a bit but pretty sure I still won that yearadmin wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:54 pm NJ, you're not alone. In more than one season, the position designations have been a point of contention. But not in many years. (e.g. Jeff Froccaro was an A. 100% an A... and he scored goals. And... He started taking face-offs. Face-off win, he stays. face-off lose, he runs off the field. Not simple. )
Re: 2019 - Week One
As I was writing the post I was thinking of you. Considered making some comments to drudge up this old point of contention but chose to let it go. But, PA, make no mistake, I was thinking explicitly of you.