CNN Says 'White Men' are the Biggest Terror Threat in US

[elonmuskrockefeller]

The community says that anyone can identify however they want, whenever they want. However they feel that day.
Unless the community says they can't?

So the community has come to grips with the fact that EVERY intentional murder is a hate crime. And doesn't need to be categorized as such. Because well, murder is murder.

No one is responsible for the actions of evil lunatics who commit violence, other than the evil lunatics who commit violence.

The left wants to tar Tucker Carlson/Ron Desantis/Fox/Every Republican as responsible because they need to silence legitimate journalism and legitimate discourse.

Says the guy who blames Dems for violence in cities.

So now you're telling us you changed your mind, it's not the Dems fault?

No one is responsible for the actions of evil lunatics who commit violence, other than the evil lunatics who commit violence.

Watching you try and troll and apply logic is the most hilarious thing I've seen in a long time, Pete. It's like watching a monkey try and figure out a Rubiks cube.

Do we need to go through this again? I hold many Democrats in high regard: your two Senators and your governor among them. I also am constantly frustrated by similarly rational Democratic Senators who lockstep-vote for absolutely batsh*t insane federal judges who basically green-light violent crime time and again.

I chalk that up to backroom horse-trading with Schumer, who indeed is a scummy guy.

I'd venture that half my friends are Democrats. I don't ask them because generally politics don't come up at gatherings, but I'd bet my guess is accurate enough.

So far as violent crime and high murder rates in places like Minneapolis and Seattle and Portland and Baltimore and St. Louis and yup Denver, yup, you betcha, that's a direct result of loose laws and enforcement by Democratic politicians/DA's/judges who virtue-signal to their voters that 'ACAB' and that sort of juvenile Democratic nonsense known only to Democratic political hacks. That doesn't mean every Democrat is responsible; just that when violent crime is up, it's always a Democratic politician running the show. Always. Never fails.

[a fan]

So far as violent crime and high murder rates in places like Minneapolis and Seattle and Portland and Baltimore and St. Louis and yup Denver, yup, you betcha, that's a direct result of loose laws and enforcement by Democratic politicians/DA's/judges who virtue-signal to their voters that 'ACAB' and that sort of juvenile Democratic nonsense known only to Democratic political hacks

Which COMPLETELY contradicts No one is responsible for the actions of evil lunatics who commit violence, other than the evil lunatics who commit violence

Toddler. It's like talking to a toddler.

[elonmuskrockefeller]

So far as violent crime and high murder rates in places like Minneapolis and Seattle and Portland and Baltimore and St. Louis and yup Denver, yup, you betcha, that's a direct result of loose laws and enforcement by Democratic politicians/DA's/judges who virtue-signal to their voters that 'ACAB' and that sort of juvenile Democratic nonsense known only to Democratic political hacks

Which COMPLETELY contradicts No one is responsible for the actions of evil lunatics who commit violence, other than the evil lunatics who commit violence

Toddler. It's like talking to a toddler.

You don't understand basic logic theory like you should, assuming you want to contribute on social media.

No one has said that Democratic politicians are LEGALLY responsible for murders that happen on their watch; they are however MORALLY responsible, where they rule and violent crime is out of control, for creating the environment where violent crime is accepted as the price of living in their communities, where prison is an upgrade over their existing living environment, where the price of a life is less than the price of a loaf of bread, and especially where they empathize with a group that screams "ACAB" every minute (Ilhan, Pressley, Jaypal).

The antipode to this is when Democratic politicians like AOC ('Boebert has blood on her hands') and every DNC influencer media hack like Nicolle Wallace/Ben Collins claim that Republicans are responsible for every mass shooting in America, even when the shooter isn't a Republican (hello Colorado Springs and Chesapeake VA) and when every republican politician is begging for harsher punishment for violent criminals in the first place.

And when the MAGA claim fails to pan out, they pivot instead to claiming that the murderer was a victim of MAGA and deserves sympathy, because you know the hierarchy of grievance says a non-binary person trumps a gay person.

Not only are Republicans not legally responsible for these tragedies, they aren't even morally responsible. Unlike those you curiously always defend here...

[a fan]

So far as violent crime and high murder rates in places like Minneapolis and Seattle and Portland and Baltimore and St. Louis and yup Denver, yup, you betcha, that's a direct result of loose laws and enforcement by Democratic politicians/DA's/judges who virtue-signal to their voters that 'ACAB' and that sort of juvenile Democratic nonsense known only to Democratic political hacks

Which COMPLETELY contradicts No one is responsible for the actions of evil lunatics who commit violence, other than the evil lunatics who commit violence

Toddler. It's like talking to a toddler.

You don't understand basic logic theory like you should, assuming you want to contribute on social media.

You mean "basic logic". What the heck is "basis logic theory"?

Did you even read your own quote? Nothing about "legal". You put the violence at the feet of the offenders. Which is great.

So.....you can't blame lawmakers for it, my man. No matter how much you want to.

Or, if you prefer, blame "someone else". Pick one. You want to have it both ways, naturally.

You want anything that happens anywhere that's bad to be the Dems fault. And naturally, any lawmaker with a R by their name? Oh, nothing is their fault.

So we're right back to you acting like a toddler. More entertaining that the World Cup watching you realize "oh yeah, I DID say that no one is responsible for the actions of evil lunatics who commit violence, other than the evil lunatics who commit violence"

[elonmuskrockefeller]

So far as violent crime and high murder rates in places like Minneapolis and Seattle and Portland and Baltimore and St. Louis and yup Denver, yup, you betcha, that's a direct result of loose laws and enforcement by Democratic politicians/DA's/judges who virtue-signal to their voters that 'ACAB' and that sort of juvenile Democratic nonsense known only to Democratic political hacks

Which COMPLETELY contradicts No one is responsible for the actions of evil lunatics who commit violence, other than the evil lunatics who commit violence

Toddler. It's like talking to a toddler.

You don't understand basic logic theory like you should, assuming you want to contribute on social media.

You mean "basic logic". What the heck is "basis logic theory"?

Did you even read your own quote? Nothing about "legal". You put the violence at the feet of the offenders. Which is great.

So.....you can't blame lawmakers for it, my man. No matter how much you want to.

Or, if you prefer, blame "someone else". Pick one. You want to have it both ways, naturally.

You want anything that happens anywhere that's bad to be the Dems fault. And naturally, any lawmaker with a R by their name? Oh, nothing is their fault.

So we're right back to you acting like a toddler.

How are Democrats suppressing fentanyl deaths/murders, a fan? What's your squad's plan? 100,000 a year, mostly young kids just starting out in life. What's your plan, a fan?

[a fan]

How are Democrats suppressing fentanyl deaths/murders, a fan? What's your squad's plan? 100,000 a year, mostly young kids just starting out in life. What's your plan, a fan?

Look over there!! A squirrel!!

Translation: Petey wants us to ignore that he completely contradicted himself, yet again, and desperately wants to move on.

[elonmuskrockefeller]

How are Democrats suppressing fentanyl deaths/murders, a fan? What's your squad's plan? 100,000 a year, mostly young kids just starting out in life. What's your plan, a fan?

Look over there!! A squirrel!!

Translation: Petey wants us to ignore that he completely contradicted himself, yet again, and desperately wants to move on.

No I'm not. I just think you're full of sh*t here way more often than not, and make excuses constantly for the party you implausibly claim not to be part of. Man up and defend your party's policies for once, a fan; not everything is 'republican bad'.

[a fan]

No I'm not. I just think you're full of sh*t here way more often than not, and make excuses constantly for the party you implausibly claim not to be part of.

I didn't mention the Dems anywhere, my toddler friend. YOU did.

Try and keep up with your own trolling

[Brooklyn]

You don't understand basic logic theory like you should, assuming you want to contribute on social media.

No one has said that Democratic politicians are LEGALLY responsible for murders that happen on their watch; they are however MORALLY responsible, where they rule and violent crime is out of control, for creating the environment where violent crime is accepted as the price of living in their communities, where prison is an upgrade over their existing living environment, where the price of a life is less than the price of a loaf of bread, and especially where they empathize with a group that screams "ACAB" every minute (Ilhan, Pressley, Jaypal).

The antipode to this is when Democratic politicians like AOC ('Boebert has blood on her hands') and every DNC influencer media hack like Nicolle Wallace/Ben Collins claim that Republicans are responsible for every mass shooting in America, even when the shooter isn't a Republican (hello Colorado Springs and Chesapeake VA) and when every republican politician is begging for harsher punishment for violent criminals in the first place.

And when the MAGA claim fails to pan out, they pivot instead to claiming that the murderer was a victim of MAGA and deserves sympathy, because you know the hierarchy of grievance says a non-binary person trumps a gay person.

Not only are Republicans not legally responsible for these tragedies, they aren't even morally responsible. Unlike those you curiously always defend here...

But if this is true for Democrats, why isn't it for the Republicans?

The Parkland school attack, Stephen Paddock's attack in Las Vegas in which 60 people died and several hundred wounded, and others occurred under tRump. And they were done by Republicans!

Double standards, much?

[a fan]

You don't understand basic logic theory like you should, assuming you want to contribute on social media.

No one has said that Democratic politicians are LEGALLY responsible for murders that happen on their watch; they are however MORALLY responsible, where they rule and violent crime is out of control, for creating the environment where violent crime is accepted as the price of living in their communities, where prison is an upgrade over their existing living environment, where the price of a life is less than the price of a loaf of bread, and especially where they empathize with a group that screams "ACAB" every minute (Ilhan, Pressley, Jaypal).

The antipode to this is when Democratic politicians like AOC ('Boebert has blood on her hands') and every DNC influencer media hack like Nicolle Wallace/Ben Collins claim that Republicans are responsible for every mass shooting in America, even when the shooter isn't a Republican (hello Colorado Springs and Chesapeake VA) and when every republican politician is begging for harsher punishment for violent criminals in the first place.

And when the MAGA claim fails to pan out, they pivot instead to claiming that the murderer was a victim of MAGA and deserves sympathy, because you know the hierarchy of grievance says a non-binary person trumps a gay person.

Not only are Republicans not legally responsible for these tragedies, they aren't even morally responsible. Unlike those you curiously always defend here...

But if this is true for Democrats, why isn't it for the Republicans?

The Parkland school attack, Stephen Paddock's attack in Las Vegas in which 60 people died and several hundred wounded, and others occurred under tRump. And they were done by Republicans!

Double standards, much?

One set of rules for for D's, and one set of rules for R's from Petey? Naaaaaw. Pete would NEVER.

[Brooklyn]

How are Democrats suppressing fentanyl deaths/murders, a fan? What's your squad's plan? 100,000 a year, mostly young kids just starting out in life. What's your plan, a fan?

Republican Messiah tRump had plenty of time to fix up the fent mess but failed to do so. Why?

[NattyBohChamps04]

How are Democrats suppressing fentanyl deaths/murders, a fan? What's your squad's plan? 100,000 a year, mostly young kids just starting out in life. What's your plan, a fan?

Look over there!! A squirrel!!

Translation: Petey wants us to ignore that he completely contradicted himself, yet again, and desperately wants to move on.

Yep. And when you post the actions the Democrats have taken? He ignores them or says they're bullshirt. Then moves on to another topic in his Gish Gallop.

Whether or not it works long term is another thing. But they've had a plan ready way before Biden was elected.

[Farfromgeneva]

You don't understand basic logic theory like you should, assuming you want to contribute on social media.

No one has said that Democratic politicians are LEGALLY responsible for murders that happen on their watch; they are however MORALLY responsible, where they rule and violent crime is out of control, for creating the environment where violent crime is accepted as the price of living in their communities, where prison is an upgrade over their existing living environment, where the price of a life is less than the price of a loaf of bread, and especially where they empathize with a group that screams "ACAB" every minute (Ilhan, Pressley, Jaypal).

The antipode to this is when Democratic politicians like AOC ('Boebert has blood on her hands') and every DNC influencer media hack like Nicolle Wallace/Ben Collins claim that Republicans are responsible for every mass shooting in America, even when the shooter isn't a Republican (hello Colorado Springs and Chesapeake VA) and when every republican politician is begging for harsher punishment for violent criminals in the first place.

And when the MAGA claim fails to pan out, they pivot instead to claiming that the murderer was a victim of MAGA and deserves sympathy, because you know the hierarchy of grievance says a non-binary person trumps a gay person.

Not only are Republicans not legally responsible for these tragedies, they aren't even morally responsible. Unlike those you curiously always defend here...

But if this is true for Democrats, why isn't it for the Republicans?

The Parkland school attack, Stephen Paddock's attack in Las Vegas in which 60 people died and several hundred wounded, and others occurred under tRump. And they were done by Republicans!

Double standards, much?

No becuase one has to have standards to begin with.

[Brooklyn]

No becuase one has to have standards to begin with.

Oh I see. So Repukeblicons with their holier-than-thou-and-better-than-you-can-ever-hope-to-be have "standards" that are unparalleled and unmatchable. They cannot be held to their own standards as they are accountable only to God, Allah, and the Lords of Mount Olympus. Well now, that comes as quite a revelation. But Democrats are fully accountable because, in your view, they do not have standards.

Hmmm ~ well let's see. Democrats hounded Al Franken out of office for a photograph that had been posed according to its photographer. And it was the Dems who kicked him out. Not the Republicans. Meanwhile, Leeann Tweeden who made these false accusations has been online many multiples of times sexually harassing men and that's ok to her fellow Republicans. Then there's the matter of rapist Herschel Walker running for Senate on the GOP ticket. No one in his party demanded he be kicked out of that position. So which is the true party of principle???

[Farfromgeneva]

No becuase one has to have standards to begin with.

Oh I see. So Repukeblicons with their holier-than-thou-and-better-than-you-can-ever-hope-to-be have "standards" that are unparalleled and unmatchable. They cannot be held to their own standards as they are accountable only to God, Allah, and the Lords of Mount Olympus. Well now, that comes as quite a revelation. But Democrats are fully accountable because, in your view, they do not have standards.

Hmmm ~ well let's see. Democrats hounded Al Franken out of office for a photograph that had been posed according to its photographer. And it was the Dems who kicked him out. Not the Republicans. Meanwhile, Leeann Tweeden who made these false accusations has been online many multiples of times sexually harassing men and that's ok to her fellow Republicans. Then there's the matter of rapist Herschel Walker running for Senate on the GOP ticket. No one in his party demanded he be kicked out of that position. So which is the true party of principle???

What are you taking about?

I am totally confused. If you’d like me to explicate more I will but that’s off the deep end beyond that makes me look like an amateur and I have been known to jump hard and fast.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=xRxqY4wuTHw

[Brooklyn]

^ that's ok. The bottom line has been well established. Democrats are clearly principled. RepubliCONs are not.

[Farfromgeneva]

^ that's ok. The bottom line has been well established. Democrats are clearly principled. RepubliCONs are not.

I was saying the dude with many personalities who just made me famous had no standards. Not democrats.

You should’ve asked if you didn’t understand my comment.

But hey, you’ve been blessed by Pope Peter Brown so I guess that makes you a saint.

[Brooklyn]

^ that's ok. The bottom line has been well established. Democrats are clearly principled. RepubliCONs are not.

I was saying the dude with many personalities who just made me famous had no standards. Not democrats.

You should’ve asked if you didn’t understand my comment.

But hey, you’ve been blessed by Pope Peter Brown so I guess that makes you a saint.

Been blessed by both the left and the right. Must be doing something right.

[Farfromgeneva]

^ that's ok. The bottom line has been well established. Democrats are clearly principled. RepubliCONs are not.

I was saying the dude with many personalities who just made me famous had no standards. Not democrats.

You should’ve asked if you didn’t understand my comment.

But hey, you’ve been blessed by Pope Peter Brown so I guess that makes you a saint.

Been blessed by both the left and the right. Must be doing something right.

Funny my blessing from both sides have been stuff rolling downhill.

Dropped some pics re old NYC on that thread mainly for you.

[kramerica.inc]

The community says that anyone can identify however they want, whenever they want. However they feel that day.
Unless the community says they can't?

So the community has come to grips with the fact that EVERY intentional murder is a hate crime. And doesn't need to be categorized as such. Because well, murder is murder.

well...there are a lots of different reasons for murder...money, revenge, passion, bigotry (hate), war crimes, dog barking...we do differentiate and for good reason.

Yes, intent and premeditation are the most important parts. After that, the circumstances are important, to tell you about their threat to society.
but if you kill someone to get money, (and think that is a appropriate move) that is just as scary as someone who targets someone out of pure hate.
The threat to society is the same. Either way, no one is safe around someone who thinks either of those are reasons worth killing over.