cradleandshoot wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 5:23 pm
MDlaxfan76 wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 5:10 pm
And of course, given that reality about the laws involving public corruption, it should be no wonder that Weiss hasn't brought those sorts of charges against Joe and Hunter Biden...enormous IF, but IF there actually was any wink wink between Joe Biden's official actions and Hunter's getting paid excessively, the prosecution would need to be able to prove there was an actual quid pro quo.
Gotta have hard cold evidence of such and nothing remotely close to such proof has materialized from any credible source during all these years. Indeed, the closest to such as been the testimony of Archer that Hunter and Joe sometimes spoke, whether in-person or on the phone, in the presence of Hunter's business associates. But never about any actual business or official acts to be exchanged...nada...no "receipts", no proof.
Apparently the FBI and IRS have had access to all sorts of bank records etc, none of which show any excessive payments to Joe or Jill, whether through Hunter or in any other way...and even IF the money had flowed, that doesn't mean a quid pro was involved, much less is provable.
And the only official action that there's been any claim was somehow beneficial to one of the parties paying Hunter has been quite thoroughly debunked as not actually beneficial and more importantly entirely consistent with the policies of the US and our EU and NATO partners encouraging anti-corruption efforts in Ukraine. Total consensus.
So, no quid pro quo has even been credibly alleged much less is something that could be proven in court.
In contrast, we have Trump who is knee deep convicted fraudster, proven 'rapist'/sexual assaulter, and 4 major long 'speaking' indictments replete with receipts of crimes.
The "Deep State" DOJ/FBI cares about actually proving crimes...they may take a long time to put a case together, but they only bring the cases they are confident they will nail.
And it just isn't there, far as we and any of the 'Impeachment numbskulls' know, about Joe.
Your very fortunate you never became a gambler. We are always searching high and low looking for gullible people like yourself. Two questions for you..why would Burisma pay a dumbass like Hunter Biden 83,000 dollars a month for doing nothing?? Do you know who the big guy is??
ohh, I think they paid Hunter for his name and the perception of access, should they need it.
But that is not a crime.
The crime would need to be that they asked Joe to do something and he asked to be paid to do it. But I don't think that ever happened, through there's always a chance that despite all the investigating they simply haven't uncovered the actual quid pro quo transaction.
A chance, slim as it might be, is not a crime.
And most importantly, there's no proof of a crime.
Heck, there isn't even an actual credible allegation of specific crime, much less with proof.
We all agree that trading on the name and perception of access to power is scummy...but it ain't a crime...maybe it should be, but it ain't. And, unless there's an actual conspiracy, there's no crime committed by a family member either. Can't prove a crime, can't prove a conspiracy...
BUT what we do know is that Trump committed fraud and sexual assault, proven in court, and is indicted for numerous super serious crimes related to his actions as POTUS and former POTUS. Which, based on what we know so far from the indictments, certainly looks like will be proven in court, hands down.
And the Republicans are panicked, with Trump demanding that they dirty up Joe to make it seem like he's corrupt too, diverting attention from the actual criminal to 'they all do it'...or are you too gullible to see that that's what they're doing?