Page 1 of 1

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 12:16 pm
by Matnum PI
For 2021, maybe we should consider changing our As and Ms to Os.

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 1:50 pm
by greenielax
I don't necessarily object, but it would make the fantasy game and strategy (both in drafting and before games) different. In some ways, requiring balance between As and Ms is a equalizing factor. I could be wrong, but wouldn't the stats show that As have a higher points average than Ms? If so, the drafting rush would be to As. As it is now, you know you have to try for high point getters in each category. More strategy required.

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 1:51 pm
by nclaxin
I am against it!!!

I would have drafted nothing but starting attackmen....

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:29 pm
by admin
nclaxin wrote: Thu Oct 10, 2019 1:51 pm I am against it!!!

I would have drafted nothing but starting attackmen....
For next season, 2021. Not this season.

And, greenie, agreed. Definitely different than the past but... Isn't our parsing As and Ms and relic from the past? With LSMs and SSDMs taking over the D duties, is there really a difference between an A and an M?

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 2:59 pm
by greenielax
There is a difference in scoring and a difference in on-field time, for sure. Whether that's enough to justify continuing the way we do it is debatable. But you certainly don't see fantasy football lumping all offensive players together. I think I come down on the side of keeping the distinction (unless someone can persuade me otherwise) because I think the added strategic component (and necessary research by the coach) makes it worth it.

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 8:56 pm
by admin
football comparison is a bad one. very different. either way, just a thought. we obviously have a lot of time to think about it.

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Thu Oct 10, 2019 9:57 pm
by OCanada
I think it places later drafters at a disadvantage. Cure try some mids get drafted earlier because you need to have three more or less productive. A change will mean the person drafting last will find 16 or more attackmen drafted before they get a chance to draft. If that move is to be considered I think we woukd need to double the number of teams

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 8:14 am
by nclaxin
What I was talking about is current rosters. If we move into 2021 with just an "O" distinction...I would be a bit cranky as I 'reached" on some picks last year and this year to make sure I had middies who would put up points.

I passed over some attackmen who I knew would do so.

I would be at a disadvantage in 2021 because of this.

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:26 pm
by admin
Good point.

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Fri Oct 11, 2019 12:26 pm
by admin
Good point.

Re: Change As and Ms to Os

Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2019 7:42 am
by Uklax
Also dislike this idea, the A/M is fine as is because Middies often play in lines (1st,2nd etc) whereas attackers are there for every play so there is a clear difference and rank, you'd just play 6 attackers every week.

My starting line up this year even with the same squad would be totally different for example.... My 5 attackers from last year would all start over any of my mids.

I think its fine as is