AOC

[ggait]

"The electoral college is a disaster for a democracy." - Donald J. Trump - November 7th, 2012 at 12:45AM via Tweet.

well, he's sorta correct, IF he's referring to a pure democracy.

since we don't exactly have a pure democracy, it's nonsense.

i didnt expect him to get the nuance. it's clear he doesnt understand the constitution.

I can't wait for the day when Texas becomes a swing state. Because the next day, the GOP will be screaming about how we need to get rid of that stupid crazy Electoral College.

The Dems probably would still be OK with getting rid of the EC, but it would serve the GOP right if the Dems changed their tune at that point.

[Typical Lax Dad]

I hear AOC is out supporting antifa now:
https://www.worldtribune.com/report-oca ... or-antifa/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-tribune/

Hmmm.....the only other lemming that visits this lame website is MDLax. Same person? Certainly in mindset.

SO AOC did NOT support the folks protesting straight pride parade arrests? 3 sides to every story.....but not for most of the folks on these threads...

......next time your up this way, why don't you visit JP and the Lucy Parsons Center ?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ayann ... ar-AAGI1Gg

Yeah, who cares whether a 'source' is known to be far right or far left biased and doesn't follow any sort of journalistic ethics...why should we care?

I feel really bad for all those straight folk from Sudbury, Lexington, Weston, Quincy, Belmont, Hingham and Canton marching. Life has been cruel to them. They are just trying to bring some attention to their cause in an effort to get a fair deal. No reason to stay in the closet as a straight person in 2019!!

[youthathletics]

Always has to bring in race, gender, and politics: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2SHRjSnvuo/

[MDlaxfan76]

Always has to bring in race, gender, and politics: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2SHRjSnvuo/

Ya und?

[youthathletics]

Always has to bring in race, gender, and politics: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2SHRjSnvuo/

Ya und?

Because the front page was about the absence of empathy or connection with this horrific event by Omar. It had nothing to do with race, gender, or politics....the caption says it all. And for AOC to not realize that as well.....that speaks volumes.

[runrussellrun]

I hear AOC is out supporting antifa now:
https://www.worldtribune.com/report-oca ... or-antifa/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-tribune/

Hmmm.....the only other lemming that visits this lame website is MDLax. Same person? Certainly in mindset.

SO AOC did NOT support the folks protesting straight pride parade arrests? 3 sides to every story.....but not for most of the folks on these threads...

......next time your up this way, why don't you visit JP and the Lucy Parsons Center ?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ayann ... ar-AAGI1Gg

Was at a spot in West Roxbury on Sunday...

That's nice....Phuk Cafe? I'll be eating at SOphia in Rosie square tonight.....

Meanwhile.......sources. Everything posted about AOC is true.

I try not to read anything about AOC. Just like her predecessor. Not sure who decided she has a national profile. Probably same people that decided Yankee - Red Sox is a rivalry the rest of the country should care about.

wow.....just don't chime in on the subject than..........You make a claim, it's found to be a false claim....and suddenly you just don't have the time or care??????

[runrussellrun]

I hear AOC is out supporting antifa now:
https://www.worldtribune.com/report-oca ... or-antifa/

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-tribune/

Hmmm.....the only other lemming that visits this lame website is MDLax. Same person? Certainly in mindset.

SO AOC did NOT support the folks protesting straight pride parade arrests? 3 sides to every story.....but not for most of the folks on these threads...

......next time your up this way, why don't you visit JP and the Lucy Parsons Center ?

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ayann ... ar-AAGI1Gg

Yeah, who cares whether a 'source' is known to be far right or far left biased and doesn't follow any sort of journalistic ethics...why should we care?

I feel really bad for all those straight folk from Sudbury, Lexington, Weston, Quincy, Belmont, Hingham and Canton marching. Life has been cruel to them. They are just trying to bring some attention to their cause in an effort to get a fair deal. No reason to stay in the closet as a straight person in 2019!!

Canton? Quincy? I don't understand If people want to have a parade, it is there right to do so.

[MDlaxfan76]

Always has to bring in race, gender, and politics: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2SHRjSnvuo/

Ya und?

Because the front page was about the absence of empathy or connection with this horrific event by Omar. It had nothing to do with race, gender, or politics....the caption says it all. And for AOC to not realize that as well.....that speaks volumes.

Whoa, the article was attacking her colleague, right?
It wasn't today or otherwise commemorating the horrific events of 9-11, it was an attack on a Representative.
AOC responded to the attack quite responsibly IMO, focusing on how inappropriate it was to use that image in a political attack. She was quite aware, rightfully so, of the enormous emotional impact that image has with folks, especially her fellow New Yorkers.

I quite agree.
I also agree that the folks attacking the Rep and AOC are indeed attacking women of color, Americans, in a reprehensible way.

For instance, here's the really ugly comment made beside that video clip you posted:

claudiak613
What a POS she has no business even speaking about 9/11 she is an America hater like the rest of her squad. She’s a cancer in our government and needs to extracted with the rest of the malignant tumors that hold office in her party.

[old salt]

Always has to bring in race, gender, and politics: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2SHRjSnvuo/

Ya und?

Because the front page was about the absence of empathy or connection with this horrific event by Omar. It had nothing to do with race, gender, or politics....the caption says it all. And for AOC to not realize that as well.....that speaks volumes.

Whoa, the article was attacking her colleague, right?
It wasn't today or otherwise commemorating the horrific events of 9-11, it was an attack on a Representative.
AOC responded to the attack quite responsibly IMO, focusing on how inappropriate it was to use that image in a political attack. She was quite aware, rightfully so, of the enormous emotional impact that image has with folks, especially her fellow New Yorkers.

I quite agree.
I also agree that the folks attacking the Rep and AOC are indeed attacking women of color, Americans, in a reprehensible way.

For instance, here's the really ugly comment made beside that video clip you posted:

claudiak613
What a POS she has no business even speaking about 9/11 she is an America hater like the rest of her squad. She’s a cancer in our government and needs to extracted with the rest of the malignant tumors that hold office in her party.

Sneaker licker

[runrussellrun]

Always has to bring in race, gender, and politics: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2SHRjSnvuo/

Ya und?

Because the front page was about the absence of empathy or connection with this horrific event by Omar. It had nothing to do with race, gender, or politics....the caption says it all. And for AOC to not realize that as well.....that speaks volumes.

Whoa, the article was attacking her colleague, right?
It wasn't today or otherwise commemorating the horrific events of 9-11, it was an attack on a Representative.
AOC responded to the attack quite responsibly IMO, focusing on how inappropriate it was to use that image in a political attack. She was quite aware, rightfully so, of the enormous emotional impact that image has with folks, especially her fellow New Yorkers.

I quite agree.
I also agree that the folks attacking the Rep and AOC are indeed attacking women of color, Americans, in a reprehensible way.

For instance, here's the really ugly comment made beside that video clip you posted:

claudiak613
What a POS she has no business even speaking about 9/11 she is an America hater like the rest of her squad. She’s a cancer in our government and needs to extracted with the rest of the malignant tumors that hold office in her party.

MDLAX.

YES or NO

Did you read the NY Post article?

[Typical Lax Dad]

Always has to bring in race, gender, and politics: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2SHRjSnvuo/

Ya und?

Because the front page was about the absence of empathy or connection with this horrific event by Omar. It had nothing to do with race, gender, or politics....the caption says it all. And for AOC to not realize that as well.....that speaks volumes.

Whoa, the article was attacking her colleague, right?
It wasn't today or otherwise commemorating the horrific events of 9-11, it was an attack on a Representative.
AOC responded to the attack quite responsibly IMO, focusing on how inappropriate it was to use that image in a political attack. She was quite aware, rightfully so, of the enormous emotional impact that image has with folks, especially her fellow New Yorkers.

I quite agree.
I also agree that the folks attacking the Rep and AOC are indeed attacking women of color, Americans, in a reprehensible way.

For instance, here's the really ugly comment made beside that video clip you posted:

claudiak613
What a POS she has no business even speaking about 9/11 she is an America hater like the rest of her squad. She’s a cancer in our government and needs to extracted with the rest of the malignant tumors that hold office in her party.

Tripe.

[MDlaxfan76]

Always has to bring in race, gender, and politics: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2SHRjSnvuo/

Ya und?

Because the front page was about the absence of empathy or connection with this horrific event by Omar. It had nothing to do with race, gender, or politics....the caption says it all. And for AOC to not realize that as well.....that speaks volumes.

Whoa, the article was attacking her colleague, right?
It wasn't today or otherwise commemorating the horrific events of 9-11, it was an attack on a Representative.
AOC responded to the attack quite responsibly IMO, focusing on how inappropriate it was to use that image in a political attack. She was quite aware, rightfully so, of the enormous emotional impact that image has with folks, especially her fellow New Yorkers.

I quite agree.
I also agree that the folks attacking the Rep and AOC are indeed attacking women of color, Americans, in a reprehensible way.

For instance, here's the really ugly comment made beside that video clip you posted:

claudiak613
What a POS she has no business even speaking about 9/11 she is an America hater like the rest of her squad. She’s a cancer in our government and needs to extracted with the rest of the malignant tumors that hold office in her party.

MDLAX.

YES or NO

Did you read the NY Post article?

No, did you or youth link it?

I did pause the video to see what she was talking about with the cover. Read the 'title' of the article.

I certainly recall the how this all went down, the issues involved, but no, I didn't read the article.
Happy to do so, but she was talking about the cover and the use of that image as part of a political attack.

And that also seemed to be what was on youth's mind as well.

[MDlaxfan76]

Always has to bring in race, gender, and politics: https://www.instagram.com/p/B2SHRjSnvuo/

Ya und?

Because the front page was about the absence of empathy or connection with this horrific event by Omar. It had nothing to do with race, gender, or politics....the caption says it all. And for AOC to not realize that as well.....that speaks volumes.

Whoa, the article was attacking her colleague, right?
It wasn't today or otherwise commemorating the horrific events of 9-11, it was an attack on a Representative.
AOC responded to the attack quite responsibly IMO, focusing on how inappropriate it was to use that image in a political attack. She was quite aware, rightfully so, of the enormous emotional impact that image has with folks, especially her fellow New Yorkers.

I quite agree.
I also agree that the folks attacking the Rep and AOC are indeed attacking women of color, Americans, in a reprehensible way.

For instance, here's the really ugly comment made beside that video clip you posted:

claudiak613
What a POS she has no business even speaking about 9/11 she is an America hater like the rest of her squad. She’s a cancer in our government and needs to extracted with the rest of the malignant tumors that hold office in her party.

Sneaker licker

+ clapping hands emoji

[runrussellrun]

MDLAX

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jknPryWnCCk

wiki says OAN is right wing......and you call yourself right wing...don't understand why you don't watch OAN

ALso, why isn't this story in the Boston Globe? Deny narrative, censorship

[Typical Lax Dad]

MDLAX

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jknPryWnCCk

wiki says OAN is right wing......and you call yourself right wing...don't understand why you don't watch OAN

ALso, why isn't this story in the Boston Globe? Deny narrative, censorship

DEPLORABLE

[runrussellrun]

MDLAX

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jknPryWnCCk

wiki says OAN is right wing......and you call yourself right wing...don't understand why you don't watch OAN

ALso, why isn't this story in the Boston Globe? Deny narrative, censorship

DEPLORABLE

been called worse.......the best I ever heard was from my Hero's coach, " man, there aren't enough synonyms for "suck" to describe how you are playing , sit down " Rather be deplorable, than suck.

But, sarcasim aside, these people attacked police officers. The Boston Police Union.....go look up their press release on this issue.

What do you think happened?

Dave Chappell best marketer evah, and the MSM is going along with it.

The oligarchy controlling the narrative, (alphabet SEX issue ) IE: Vox and similar left leaning news, were the only ones allowed to vote for rotten tomoatoes. Collectively, they gave it (on Netflix ) a zero. That's 0%. Obviously, people found out, voted, and now rotten rating is 98% approval. MSM still up in arms about his new special.

How this relates to AOC and this issue? People are sick of hearing BBq stories , where it's repeated, " what....YOU too? I know, right, couldn't even register for classes unless the typed something in the "whats your pronoun" field " "Crazy" " yup, just so sick of all this PC crap........."

So, a few people decided to pull a permit, and marched. Costing the city plenty. Walsh wants to ban ALL parades, including St. Patricks day, he was so pissed after the parade/march. That's what my sources say. After calming down, "not ALL parades, only the ones that can't make it past a google search filter "

[Typical Lax Dad]

MDLAX

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jknPryWnCCk

wiki says OAN is right wing......and you call yourself right wing...don't understand why you don't watch OAN

ALso, why isn't this story in the Boston Globe? Deny narrative, censorship

DEPLORABLE

been called worse.......the best I ever heard was from my Hero's coach, " man, there aren't enough synonyms for "suck" to describe how you are playing , sit down " Rather be deplorable, than suck.

But, sarcasim aside, these people attacked police officers. The Boston Police Union.....go look up their press release on this issue.

What do you think happened?

Dave Chappell best marketer evah, and the MSM is going along with it.

The oligarchy controlling the narrative, (alphabet SEX issue ) IE: Vox and similar left leaning news, were the only ones allowed to vote for rotten tomoatoes. Collectively, they gave it (on Netflix ) a zero. That's 0%. Obviously, people found out, voted, and now rotten rating is 98% approval. MSM still up in arms about his new special.

How this relates to AOC and this issue? People are sick of hearing BBq stories , where it's repeated, " what....YOU too? I know, right, couldn't even register for classes unless the typed something in the "whats your pronoun" field " "Crazy" " yup, just so sick of all this PC dump........."

So, a few people decided to pull a permit, and marched. Costing the city plenty. Walsh wants to ban ALL parades, including St. Patricks day, he was so ticked after the parade/march. That's what my sources say. After calming down, "not ALL parades, only the ones that can't make it past a google search filter "

The program was deplorable. Not you. Didn’t know straight folks = Trump supporters. So forkin’ stupid I don’t know why you bother with that tripe.

I found out why it was deplorable.....I know you aren't a believer but Jesus....

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/one-amer ... s-network/

[runrussellrun]

Pressley will get primaried......you don't mess with Police Unions...and survive. Very stupid on Rep. Pressley's part.

AOC has already sealed her fate by supporting (vote the way Pelosi says), so she should be safe. If only the distance from the BOston Police Union. AOC will be contrite, make some "statement" in support of the BPU.....

Regarding Omar from Minn. it's not so much that she said "someone did something".......it was her smile after delivering that idiotic statement that makes me sick. TLD, for someone that care so little about AOC, you sure do hit this thread often.

[runrussellrun]

The program was deplorable. Not you. Didn’t know straight folks = Trump supporters. So forkin’ stupid I don’t know why you bother with that tripe.

I found out why it was deplorable.....I know you aren't a believer but Jesus....

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/one-amer ... s-network/

I will repeat, because it HAS to be repeated.

MEDIABIASfact check....IS.....well .....biased. It holds as much value as a DoC-B prediction

What do YOU know about mediabiasfact check checkers? 95% one guy. Christian Science Monitor was/is considered pretty gosh darn good journalism, why does religion have to play into it at all?

Point is, watch about 10 clips on youtube, in there entirety, from the OAN utube channel. Get back to us on what YOU think about it, not some pretend war mongering liberal in his mommies basement.

https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bi ... dishonest/

In the opening paragraph of her review of Just Facts, Media Bias Fact Check contributor Faith Locke Siewert writes:

On their article http://www.justfacts.com/racialissues.asp#affirmative, they use the Richard Sander’s (law professor at UCLA) essay “A Systematic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools.” To support much of their hypothesis, obviously against affirmative action (seeming also to support the notion of black intellectual abilities being inferior).

Those two sentences contain three demonstrable falsehoods:

“A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools” is not just an essay. It is a peer-reviewed journal paper that was published in the Stanford Law Review. Big difference.
Just Facts does not use this paper to support “much of” its research on affirmative action. The research contains more than 60 footnotes, and this paper is just one of them. Just Facts’ full research on racial issues has 498 footnotes, and this paper is two of them.
Just Facts does not offer any “hypothesis” in this research, much less “support the notion of black intellectual abilities being inferior.” To the contrary, the opening section of Just Facts’ research on racial issues covers the topic of science and presents multiple facts that challenge that notion.

Or.....you could keep on reading the same tripe from the old oligarchy pom pom waivers in the MSM.

[Typical Lax Dad]

The program was deplorable. Not you. Didn’t know straight folks = Trump supporters. So forkin’ stupid I don’t know why you bother with that tripe.

I found out why it was deplorable.....I know you aren't a believer but Jesus....

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/one-amer ... s-network/

I will repeat, because it HAS to be repeated.

MEDIABIASfact check....IS.....well .....biased. It holds as much value as a DoC-B prediction

What do YOU know about mediabiasfact check checkers? 95% one guy. Christian Science Monitor was/is considered pretty gosh darn good journalism, why does religion have to play into it at all?

Point is, watch about 10 clips on youtube, in there entirety, from the OAN utube channel. Get back to us on what YOU think about it, not some pretend war mongering liberal in his mommies basement.

https://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bi ... dishonest/

In the opening paragraph of her review of Just Facts, Media Bias Fact Check contributor Faith Locke Siewert writes:

On their article http://www.justfacts.com/racialissues.asp#affirmative, they use the Richard Sander’s (law professor at UCLA) essay “A Systematic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools.” To support much of their hypothesis, obviously against affirmative action (seeming also to support the notion of black intellectual abilities being inferior).

Those two sentences contain three demonstrable falsehoods:

“A Systemic Analysis of Affirmative Action in American Law Schools” is not just an essay. It is a peer-reviewed journal paper that was published in the Stanford Law Review. Big difference.
Just Facts does not use this paper to support “much of” its research on affirmative action. The research contains more than 60 footnotes, and this paper is just one of them. Just Facts’ full research on racial issues has 498 footnotes, and this paper is two of them.
Just Facts does not offer any “hypothesis” in this research, much less “support the notion of black intellectual abilities being inferior.” To the contrary, the opening section of Just Facts’ research on racial issues covers the topic of science and presents multiple facts that challenge that notion.

Or.....you could keep on reading the same tripe from the old oligarchy pom pom waivers in the MSM.

I looked at the history of the ownership...... you should too..... YIKES... you can travel in tripe. It is a "fee" country