2020 Elections - Trump FIRED

[cradleandshoot]

Some of you need to return from the delusion, detritus, lies, incompetence and idiocy of the rapidly fading Trump era and acknowledge a few facts:

—There was no election fraud.

—Tens of millions of us have routinely voted by mail for more than a decade. It’s the best way to vote. Period.

—Trump lost.

—Biden won.

Get over it.

DocBarrister

Sore losers, cry babies

It's like 2016 all over again!

[jhu72]

Some of you need to return from the delusion, detritus, lies, incompetence and idiocy of the rapidly fading Trump era and acknowledge a few facts:

—There was no election fraud.

—Tens of millions of us have routinely voted by mail for more than a decade. It’s the best way to vote. Period.

—Trump lost.

—Biden won.

Get over it.

DocBarrister

Sore losers, cry babies

It's like 2016 all over again!

Let's talk about 2016.

YOU VOTED FOR TRUMP IN 2016 and have been trying to hide it ever since. You really think anyone believes you? Why are you now lying to hide it??? Be a proud Trumpnista.

[cradleandshoot]

Some of you need to return from the delusion, detritus, lies, incompetence and idiocy of the rapidly fading Trump era and acknowledge a few facts:

—There was no election fraud.

—Tens of millions of us have routinely voted by mail for more than a decade. It’s the best way to vote. Period.

—Trump lost.

—Biden won.

Get over it.

DocBarrister

Sore losers, cry babies

It's like 2016 all over again!

Let's talk about 2016.

YOU VOTED FOR TRUMP IN 2016 and have been trying to hide it ever since. You really think anyone believes you? Why are you now lying to hide it??? Be a proud Trumpnista.

There is a better chance of you kissing the pope's ass than me ever having voted for trump. The last republican I voted for POTUS was guy named Reagan.

[ABV 8.3%]

I don't accept your hysterical premise. Don't holler until you're hurt. Frivolous or unsubstantiated allegations won't be investigated.

What are you talking about? We have a nation filled with citizens who ALREADY believe every single conspiracy they hear about from "some guy on the internet". And yet you think it's a good idea for Barr to stir the pot for no factual reason whatsoever?

The FBI tells us that rightwing nutjobs are the biggest threat to domestic security, and you're telling me that you think it's sooper-awesome for Barr to intentionally give these idiots ammunition and fake justification for their nuttery?

Oh yeah, what could POSSIBLY go wrong? They only tried to kidnap a sitting Governor. I'm sure the next plan is just lovely.

Don't you want to validate the credibility of the process, which is still new to much of the country, which we'll likely be using going forward ?

That's just about the dumbest sales pitch you've ever given us. If that's the goal? Do it after the election is actually over.....and you know it.

Stop trolling. You know this is wrong.llll

Why wait ? You act like this is the first recount or contested election. You want this to end well, let it play out.

Besides Harvard Medical school graduate Dr. Jill Stein, who else set up an official fundraiser to fight fraud? I mean, does the guy have to go full creep, full time? The graphics even look like a fake wrestling website. It IS a clown show, and you guys are falling for the act.

Simplest line I read regarding Trump voter fraud hotline. If you have evidence of voter fraud, why do you need to beg for evidence of fraud?

(it IS all part of the act, and ALL of you are falling for it....TAATS laughing all the way to the Panama bank) Anyone else remember the Panama Papers, Wasn't that wikileaks and Julian AssagueON first big mark, the Panama papers?

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/05/worl ... ainer.html

[RedFromMI]

Election Officials Nationwide Find No Fraud

says the NY Times headline this morning...

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/10/us/p ... e=Homepage

The Times Called Officials in Every State: No Evidence of Voter Fraud

The president and his allies have baselessly claimed that rampant voter fraud stole victory from him. Officials contacted by The Times said that there were no irregularities that affected the outcome.

Election officials in dozens of states representing both political parties said that there was no evidence that fraud or other irregularities played a role in the outcome of the presidential race, amounting to a forceful rebuke of President Trump’s portrait of a fraudulent election.

Over the last several days, the president, members of his administration, congressional Republicans and right wing allies have put forth the false claim that the election was stolen from Mr. Trump and have refused to accept results that showed Joseph R. Biden Jr. as the winner.

But top election officials across the country said in interviews and statements that the process had been a remarkable success despite record turnout and the complications of a dangerous pandemic.

“There’s a great human capacity for inventing things that aren’t true about elections,” said Frank LaRose, a Republican who serves as Ohio’s secretary of state. “The conspiracy theories and rumors and all those things run rampant. For some reason, elections breed that type of mythology.”

Steve Simon, a Democrat who is Minnesota’s secretary of state, said: “I don’t know of a single case where someone argued that a vote counted when it shouldn’t have or didn’t count when it should. There was no fraud.”

“Kansas did not experience any widespread, systematic issues with voter fraud, intimidation, irregularities or voting problems,” a spokeswoman for Scott Schwab, the Republican secretary of state in Kansas, said in an email Tuesday. “We are very pleased with how the election has gone up to this point.”

The New York Times contacted the offices of the top election officials in every state on Monday and Tuesday to ask whether they suspected or had evidence of illegal voting. Officials in 45 states responded directly to The Times. For four of the remaining states, The Times spoke to other statewide officials or found public comments from secretaries of state; none reported any major voting issues.

Statewide officials in Texas did not respond to repeated inquiries. But a spokeswoman for the top elections official in Harris County, the largest county in Texas with a population greater than many states, said that there were only a few minor issues and that “we had a very seamless election.” On Tuesday, the Republican lieutenant governor in Texas, Dan Patrick, announced a $1 million fund to reward reports of voter fraud.

Some states described small problems common to all elections, which they said they were addressing: a few instances of illegal or double voting, some technical glitches and some minor errors in math. Officials in all states are conducting their own review of the voting — a standard component of the certification process.

[dislaxxic]

Your article shows the folly of accusing people of good will (who you don't know) of being racist because they don't kowtow to your political views. It's a big part of why 71M voted for Trump. The stunned moderate Dems in the House are starting to get it. AOC & her Squad thought it was time to "confront them over their harmful politics and cloaked bigotry." Now she's whining & considering another line of work. Honest political differences are not "cloaked bigotry."

Many people are saying that it is a thoughtful look at why, exactly, so many people would vote for a man of this chararacter who honestly HAS no discernable "policy" beyond things like "build a wall", kill ObamaCare, "socialism bad", China treats us unfairly, keep burning fossil fuel, pack the courts with as many rightwing judges as possible. What else is there, seriously? Certainly nothing "military"-leaning aside from the usual "i built up the biggest military ever."

You yourself refuse to identify the "policies" you think the man is supported on in such a broad way. I think you are displaying a lot of the tendencies that the author of the piece i posted writes about. It's uncomfortable for you to talk about whatever "policy" you think got this kind of vote out for Donald Trump. This conversation most often devolves into obfuscation about "we're NOT all racist bigoted know-nothings. Your resentment comes thru as pure trolling.

It happened though, so i for one want to know why. 70 million votes is a lot of votes. The answer seems elusive and this article talked about an issue bubbling under the surface...seeking to answer the question of that unusual vote count.

Put another way...if you take out all the racist vote, the bigoted misogynist vote, and the "keep your derned hands off my medicare" anti-socialism vote, how many are left over, out of that 70 million?

..

[ABV 8.3%]

Your article shows the folly of accusing people of good will (who you don't know) of being racist because they don't kowtow to your political views. It's a big part of why 71M voted for Trump. The stunned moderate Dems in the House are starting to get it. AOC & her Squad thought it was time to "confront them over their harmful politics and cloaked bigotry." Now she's whining & considering another line of work. Honest political differences are not "cloaked bigotry."

Many people are saying that it is a thoughtful look at why, exactly, so many people would vote for a man of this chararacter who honestly HAS no discernable "policy" beyond things like "build a wall", kill ObamaCare, "socialism bad", China treats us unfairly, keep burning fossil fuel, pack the courts with as many rightwing judges as possible. What else is there, seriously? Certainly nothing "military"-leaning aside from the usual "i built up the biggest military ever."

You yourself refuse to identify the "policies" you think the man is supported on in such a broad way. I think you are displaying a lot of the tendencies that the author of the piece i posted writes about. It's uncomfortable for you to talk about whatever "policy" you think got this kind of vote out for Donald Trump. This conversation most often devolves into obfuscation about "we're NOT all racist bigoted know-nothings. Your resentment comes thru as pure trolling.

It happened though, so i for one want to know why. 70 million votes is a lot of votes. The answer seems elusive and this article talked about an issue bubbling under the surface...seeking to answer the question of that unusual vote count.

Put another way...if you take out all the racist vote, the bigoted misogynist vote, and the "keep your derned hands off my medicare" anti-socialism vote, how many are left over, out of that 70 million?

..

In one instance (of course there IS more), Trump called for Congress to do something about our crumbling infrastructure of one of our nations most prescious treasures, its National Parks.

Yes, this spring, trump twatted a challenge to COngress, and THEY delivered. Big time. Providing NPS with it's largest fixer upper budget evah.

IS this a bad thing that Trump did?

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/04/us/p ... -bill.html

But, tRump, and tRump alone, does POSITIVE things to ONLY get re-elected. Oh well, you can focus on his motives. The bill got passed with tons of support from both sides of TAATS

of course, the private companies that lease properties/hotels in the NPS system are getting free coin to fix up their cheap nitely stay motels?

https://www.nps.gov/subjects/leasing/op ... nities.htm

I mean, do you think any of tRumps taats cronies get any of these 57 year leases? Why not 5 year leases? At least the BLM (burea of land management has 20 year leases )

so, in short, more graft for tRump and his hotel friends , using public money to fix up the place. Something to do with the Boston Bruins and the "area" around North Station. The Ahwahnee Hotel needs new plumbing.

[Brooklyn]

Beware! A loathsome character has been spotted at the voting polls and was reportedly involved in devious conduct:







The Hamuburglar! Devious, deceptive, and duplicitous!

tRUMP's vote fraud hot line has been inundated with calls about him. Eeeeeeeek!

[cradleandshoot]

Your article shows the folly of accusing people of good will (who you don't know) of being racist because they don't kowtow to your political views. It's a big part of why 71M voted for Trump. The stunned moderate Dems in the House are starting to get it. AOC & her Squad thought it was time to "confront them over their harmful politics and cloaked bigotry." Now she's whining & considering another line of work. Honest political differences are not "cloaked bigotry."

Many people are saying that it is a thoughtful look at why, exactly, so many people would vote for a man of this chararacter who honestly HAS no discernable "policy" beyond things like "build a wall", kill ObamaCare, "socialism bad", China treats us unfairly, keep burning fossil fuel, pack the courts with as many rightwing judges as possible. What else is there, seriously? Certainly nothing "military"-leaning aside from the usual "i built up the biggest military ever."

You yourself refuse to identify the "policies" you think the man is supported on in such a broad way. I think you are displaying a lot of the tendencies that the author of the piece i posted writes about. It's uncomfortable for you to talk about whatever "policy" you think got this kind of vote out for Donald Trump. This conversation most often devolves into obfuscation about "we're NOT all racist bigoted know-nothings. Your resentment comes thru as pure trolling.

It happened though, so i for one want to know why. 70 million votes is a lot of votes. The answer seems elusive and this article talked about an issue bubbling under the surface...seeking to answer the question of that unusual vote count.

Put another way...if you take out all the racist vote, the bigoted misogynist vote, and the "keep your derned hands off my medicare" anti-socialism vote, how many are left over, out of that 70 million?

..

"Put another way...if you take out all the racist vote, the bigoted misogynist vote, and the "keep your derned hands off my medicare" anti-socialism vote, how many are left over, out of that 70 million?"

So your trying to sneak in a trick question? The answer is still 70 million because ALL republicans are racist, bigoted and misogynists.

[Matnum PI]

Annalisa Merelli@missanabeem
13 mins ago
So, basically:

Reality: pigs don't fly
DJT: pigs fly!
Reality: pigs do not fly, sir
DJT: They do too
DJT's buds: Maybe they do!
Everyone else: no they don't; do they?
the news: checks if perchance pigs fly
HEADLINE: CONFIRMED, no evidence found of flying pigs

[Matnum PI]

Military wife accused in GOP voter fraud claim speaks out

[Matnum PI]

In 2016, Trump won MI, PA, and WI by a combined 77,000 votes. Clinton conceded and he met with Obama 48 hours after the election.

In 2020, Biden won those same states by a combined 214,000 votes (and counting). Trump, his admin and GOP leaders won't recognize the outcome.

[dislaxxic]

So your trying to sneak in a trick question? The answer is still 70 million because ALL republicans are racist, bigoted and misogynists.

Your words, not mine.

I don't think that...and i'm trying to get to the bottom of what these results actually show.

What policies do YOU think these 70 million voters had in mind when they pulled the lever for DJT?

..

[Typical Lax Dad]

Military wife accused in GOP voter fraud claim speaks out

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald ... ls-n897796

The wheel on the bus goes ‘round and ‘round.....

[Matnum PI]

Amee Vanderpool@girlsreallyrule
1 day ago
Obama shook the hand of a racist birther, who launched years of attacks on his family because Trump won the electoral college and @BarackObama respects the peaceful transfer of power and what our country stands for.

This is what a patriot does.

[jhu72]

Your article shows the folly of accusing people of good will (who you don't know) of being racist because they don't kowtow to your political views. It's a big part of why 71M voted for Trump. The stunned moderate Dems in the House are starting to get it. AOC & her Squad thought it was time to "confront them over their harmful politics and cloaked bigotry." Now she's whining & considering another line of work. Honest political differences are not "cloaked bigotry."

Many people are saying that it is a thoughtful look at why, exactly, so many people would vote for a man of this chararacter who honestly HAS no discernable "policy" beyond things like "build a wall", kill ObamaCare, "socialism bad", China treats us unfairly, keep burning fossil fuel, pack the courts with as many rightwing judges as possible. What else is there, seriously? Certainly nothing "military"-leaning aside from the usual "i built up the biggest military ever."

You yourself refuse to identify the "policies" you think the man is supported on in such a broad way. I think you are displaying a lot of the tendencies that the author of the piece i posted writes about. It's uncomfortable for you to talk about whatever "policy" you think got this kind of vote out for Donald Trump. This conversation most often devolves into obfuscation about "we're NOT all racist bigoted know-nothings. Your resentment comes thru as pure trolling.

It happened though, so i for one want to know why. 70 million votes is a lot of votes. The answer seems elusive and this article talked about an issue bubbling under the surface...seeking to answer the question of that unusual vote count.

Put another way...if you take out all the racist vote, the bigoted misogynist vote, and the "keep your derned hands off my medicare" anti-socialism vote, how many are left over, out of that 70 million?

..

This is all about grievance. Cry babies whining and wanting to blame someone else for their problems. The culture war. Children throwing a temper tantrum because they can't get their way. Make no mistake they have some (only some, a few legitimate grievances) but are going about trying to address them the wrong way.

[Typical Lax Dad]

Your article shows the folly of accusing people of good will (who you don't know) of being racist because they don't kowtow to your political views. It's a big part of why 71M voted for Trump. The stunned moderate Dems in the House are starting to get it. AOC & her Squad thought it was time to "confront them over their harmful politics and cloaked bigotry." Now she's whining & considering another line of work. Honest political differences are not "cloaked bigotry."

Many people are saying that it is a thoughtful look at why, exactly, so many people would vote for a man of this chararacter who honestly HAS no discernable "policy" beyond things like "build a wall", kill ObamaCare, "socialism bad", China treats us unfairly, keep burning fossil fuel, pack the courts with as many rightwing judges as possible. What else is there, seriously? Certainly nothing "military"-leaning aside from the usual "i built up the biggest military ever."

You yourself refuse to identify the "policies" you think the man is supported on in such a broad way. I think you are displaying a lot of the tendencies that the author of the piece i posted writes about. It's uncomfortable for you to talk about whatever "policy" you think got this kind of vote out for Donald Trump. This conversation most often devolves into obfuscation about "we're NOT all racist bigoted know-nothings. Your resentment comes thru as pure trolling.

It happened though, so i for one want to know why. 70 million votes is a lot of votes. The answer seems elusive and this article talked about an issue bubbling under the surface...seeking to answer the question of that unusual vote count.

Put another way...if you take out all the racist vote, the bigoted misogynist vote, and the "keep your derned hands off my medicare" anti-socialism vote, how many are left over, out of that 70 million?

..

This is all about grievance. Cry babies whining and wanting to blame someone else for their problems. The culture war. Children throwing a temper tantrum because they can't get their way. Make no mistake they have some (only some, a few legitimate grievances) but are going about trying to address them the wrong way.

Old Salt called a race war before anyone I had come across. It stuck with me be because I had never considered it at all....it was like “game on”. Sad and small.

[6ftstick]

Annalisa Merelli@missanabeem
13 mins ago
So, basically:

Reality: pigs don't fly
DJT: pigs fly!
Reality: pigs do not fly, sir
DJT: They do too
DJT's buds: Maybe they do!
Everyone else: no they don't; do they?
the news: checks if perchance pigs fly
HEADLINE: CONFIRMED, no evidence found of flying pigs

Mueller: Theres no evidence of Russian collusion
You: Yes there is!

Schiffs Congressional committee: Theres no evidence of Russian Collusion
You: Yes there is!

Nadlers Committee: Theres no evidence of Russian Collusion
You: Yes there is!

FBI: Theres no evidence of Russian Collusion.
You: Yes there is!

DOJ: Theres no evidence of Russian Collusion.
You: Yes there is!

MSM: Theres no evidence of Russian Collusion.
You: Yes there is!

For 4 FKN years.

[jhu72]

Amee Vanderpool@girlsreallyrule
1 day ago
Obama shook the hand of a racist birther, who launched years of attacks on his family because Trump won the electoral college and @BarackObama respects the peaceful transfer of power and what our country stands for.

This is what a patriot does.

Yup, and for all the trashing of Hillary Clinton, she did not play silly games. She lost, BY LESS THAN ORANGE DUCE DID, but she did not trash the system, she did not trash the country, she conceded the night of the election, even though it was pretty clear at the time that the Russians did interfere.

[6ftstick]

Amee Vanderpool@girlsreallyrule
1 day ago
Obama shook the hand of a racist birther, who launched years of attacks on his family because Trump won the electoral college and @BarackObama respects the peaceful transfer of power and what our country stands for.

This is what a patriot does.

When that photo was taken there was already an unwarranted investigation ongoing of the incoming administration.

Yep that's an orderly transition alright.