Way too early Final Four

D1 Mens Lacrosse
Turnandrake
Posts: 384
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2019 7:07 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by Turnandrake »

Be glad when the extra year grad student COVID years is done.
coda
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed May 10, 2023 11:30 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by coda »

Farfromgeneva wrote: Fri Dec 29, 2023 5:35 pm
coda wrote: Fri Dec 29, 2023 10:01 am
Farfromgeneva wrote: Thu Dec 28, 2023 10:46 pm
Mr3Putt wrote: Wed Dec 27, 2023 9:39 am So, ND is not a F4 team in 24’? Why not? Kavanugh, Entemann, along w transfers are back. Didn’t Penn st lose a lot? Army has to score to win in Quarters to advance…. Can they?
Not specific to you but how come I never see anyone mention this kid who had the game winner and is as valuable as anyone IMO incl Entemann and the Kavanaughs. And I think Teflon got credit for the impact of Dobson too much last spring.

https://fightingirish.com/roster/eric-dobson/

7,3,10 on 23 shots vs JHU, UVA & Duke in playoffs. Lefty with a hard shot from midfield. Inherited him on my sons fantasy team and they went as he went generally last year.
This is some of my personal bias showing, but the Kavanaugh's are a big reason Dobson isnt mentioned. When healthy, they tend to completely dominate the ball. The offense can get really stagnant with them.. Thought they are amazing at finding effort goals
But everyone immediately gave Tevlin credit and he’s a fine player but I think giving the kid who came from Cali (good but still learning curve at high end D1 for those kids) and lost his senior year to Covid and really elevated his Soph and Jr years. 34,11 on 32% and he shot 20% as a FR in 20-21. Entemann had a great playoffs but people’s are sleeping on the difference Dobson makes between being “the people’s champ” in 2022 and the champ in 23.
I think you mean Florida, if you are talking about Dobson
Chousnake
Posts: 643
Joined: Sun Aug 05, 2018 9:01 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by Chousnake »

Wheels wrote: Fri Dec 29, 2023 1:24 pm Think PSU takes a step back. They snuck up on people this past year, and they're asking a lot of Fracyon in the net to cover up their defensive weaknesses. At some point, their average FOGO play will bite them.

JHU brings everyone back and addressed their biggest weakness (goalie) through the portal. They have an identity. They play hard. Melendez is a difference maker.

UVA
ND
MD
JHU

It is really hard to repeat in college lacrosse. Virginia had the COVID year between their titles. Maryland's run in 2022 knocked as much out of them in 2023 as did their injuries. I'm always skeptical of Duke at this point. They've had the best talent in the sport for the last 5 years, but they never seem to have the right pieces in the right places. For Maryland, having Malever back will make the offense look more like 2022 than it did last year. Deep at the midfield. Dodgers everywhere. McNaney back in goal. UVA has the best and most dynamic player in the game in Shelly (sorry, Dukies). If they don't have too much of a drop off at the FOGO position, that offense has too many weapons to fail.

The Ivy League will be a blast to watch all season long. I don't think any Ivy team has the kind roster depth needed for a Final 4 run. So many Ivy teams have great 1-10 players on their rosters but are thin/too inexperienced behind the starters.
The Ivy League can't compete with the B10/ACC? I heard that before. The talk in 2022 was that the Ivy League was finished in D1 lax after the two year COVID shut down and look what happened that season. The top Ivies bring in top recruiting classes year after year. Yes, the grad students/extra year gives the B10 and ACC an advantage, but the Ivy rosters are stacked with talent. I would not be shocked to see two Ivies in the final 8 and one on Memorial Day weekend.

And I can't wait for this extra year of eligibility to be over........
blue angels
Posts: 766
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2018 12:37 pm

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by blue angels »

Chousnake wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 8:01 pm
Wheels wrote: Fri Dec 29, 2023 1:24 pm Think PSU takes a step back. They snuck up on people this past year, and they're asking a lot of Fracyon in the net to cover up their defensive weaknesses. At some point, their average FOGO play will bite them.

JHU brings everyone back and addressed their biggest weakness (goalie) through the portal. They have an identity. They play hard. Melendez is a difference maker.

UVA
ND
MD
JHU

It is really hard to repeat in college lacrosse. Virginia had the COVID year between their titles. Maryland's run in 2022 knocked as much out of them in 2023 as did their injuries. I'm always skeptical of Duke at this point. They've had the best talent in the sport for the last 5 years, but they never seem to have the right pieces in the right places. For Maryland, having Malever back will make the offense look more like 2022 than it did last year. Deep at the midfield. Dodgers everywhere. McNaney back in goal. UVA has the best and most dynamic player in the game in Shelly (sorry, Dukies). If they don't have too much of a drop off at the FOGO position, that offense has too many weapons to fail.

The Ivy League will be a blast to watch all season long. I don't think any Ivy team has the kind roster depth needed for a Final 4 run. So many Ivy teams have great 1-10 players on their rosters but are thin/too inexperienced behind the starters.
The Ivy League can't compete with the B10/ACC? I heard that before. The talk in 2022 was that the Ivy League was finished in D1 lax after the two year COVID shut down and look what happened that season. The top Ivies bring in top recruiting classes year after year. Yes, the grad students/extra year gives the B10 and ACC an advantage, but the Ivy rosters are stacked with talent. I would not be shocked to see two Ivies in the final 8 and one on Memorial Day weekend.

And I can't wait for this extra year of eligibility to be over........
Fair points on Ivy League. They should not be underestimated. We are all speculating, but who in your opinion are the best Ivy teams and why?
cmbtp88
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2023 7:56 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by cmbtp88 »

blue angels wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 10:36 pm
Chousnake wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 8:01 pm
Wheels wrote: Fri Dec 29, 2023 1:24 pm Think PSU takes a step back. They snuck up on people this past year, and they're asking a lot of Fracyon in the net to cover up their defensive weaknesses. At some point, their average FOGO play will bite them.

JHU brings everyone back and addressed their biggest weakness (goalie) through the portal. They have an identity. They play hard. Melendez is a difference maker.

UVA
ND
MD
JHU

It is really hard to repeat in college lacrosse. Virginia had the COVID year between their titles. Maryland's run in 2022 knocked as much out of them in 2023 as did their injuries. I'm always skeptical of Duke at this point. They've had the best talent in the sport for the last 5 years, but they never seem to have the right pieces in the right places. For Maryland, having Malever back will make the offense look more like 2022 than it did last year. Deep at the midfield. Dodgers everywhere. McNaney back in goal. UVA has the best and most dynamic player in the game in Shelly (sorry, Dukies). If they don't have too much of a drop off at the FOGO position, that offense has too many weapons to fail.

The Ivy League will be a blast to watch all season long. I don't think any Ivy team has the kind roster depth needed for a Final 4 run. So many Ivy teams have great 1-10 players on their rosters but are thin/too inexperienced behind the starters.
The Ivy League can't compete with the B10/ACC? I heard that before. The talk in 2022 was that the Ivy League was finished in D1 lax after the two year COVID shut down and look what happened that season. The top Ivies bring in top recruiting classes year after year. Yes, the grad students/extra year gives the B10 and ACC an advantage, but the Ivy rosters are stacked with talent. I would not be shocked to see two Ivies in the final 8 and one on Memorial Day weekend.

And I can't wait for this extra year of eligibility to be over........
Fair points on Ivy League. They should not be underestimated. We are all speculating, but who in your opinion are the best Ivy teams and why?
not mention the ivy's also have great coaching, Shay at Yale, Byrne at Harvard, Buczek at Cornell, Murphy at UPenn, Madalon at Princeton, Kirwan at Dartmouth now and Daly at Brown, these Men are really good coaches and I would love for my kid to be coached by any of these guys....
cmbtp88
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2023 7:56 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by cmbtp88 »

Laxter wrote: Fri Dec 29, 2023 12:18 pm
ChopMan23 wrote: Thu Dec 28, 2023 10:22 am UVA
ND
HOP
Cornell
I hate to say it, but offensive midfield is a big question mark for the Hoos this year and could hinder their ability to make it to MDW. Miezan appeal rejection was big (and ridiculous given the free for all NCAA football has become) as was Lars and co missing out on most of their top middle targets in the past 2-3 recruiting cycles. I know it’s all relative (yeah, yeah, poor UVa), but the depth of talent at the position is not where it has been in the past and not at the level of Duke and UNC (who have utterly dominated recruiting of middies as of late). Not sure where all those guys will play, but that’s another issue. Too many young/unproven middies as well as true attackmen being asked to play out of position is a concern for the Hoos and could also be a problem in May. It kind of feels like a one-man show, and Schutz can only do so much.
Really I have heard that offensive midfield is not really a concern, they are deeper than you think there, many strong athletes there. The concerns going into the season for them I heard were D-midi and FO. They lost a lot in both of those spots and the roster wasn't that deep there either last year. What i'm hearing now is that D-midi looked pretty solid and deep in the fall, they brought in the Harvard transfer Yager? and they have 2 younger guys that really out performed in the fall but saw limited action last year or none in one case because of red-shirt. FO they really had no depth after losing Lasalla and having their #2 guy, a frosh, transfer out to UPenn, but they had an Injured junior Braun that is very good(not a lot of experience being Lasalla was in front of him) and is now fully healthy after missing last season with shoulder surgery. They also brought in 3 transfers there, a Junior from Navy that is very good, and a Colgate 5th year transfer Colucci that has a ton of experience as well and is a little more offensive and a little different than Braun and the navy kid, and a Binghamton kid who had great numbers last year . Think they may be more deep and solid there than many suspect, hard to replace a Lasalla tho....guess you won't know until the season starts to see exactly.
User avatar
HopFan16
Posts: 5829
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 1:22 pm

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by HopFan16 »

UVA should really have little to no concern about faceoffs. Ghobriel is good, probably top 10 in the country. And they are deeper there than they've been in awhile. They may not have a guy like LaSalla who's capable of taking over a game and scoring in bunches but as a unit they're going to be just fine, perhaps more than fine. Seems like there's a lot of effort to poke holes in a roster that I think still has at worst the 2nd or 3rd most talent in the country.
DocBarrister
Posts: 6394
Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2018 12:00 pm

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by DocBarrister »

Virginia
Cornell
ND
and …

… Johns Hopkins.

DocBarrister 8-)
@DocBarrister
FannOLax
Posts: 2203
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 12:03 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by FannOLax »

HopFan16 wrote: Mon Jan 01, 2024 2:25 pm UVA should really have little to no concern about faceoffs. Ghobriel is good, probably top 10 in the country. And they are deeper there than they've been in awhile. They may not have a guy like LaSalla who's capable of taking over a game and scoring in bunches but as a unit they're going to be just fine, perhaps more than fine. Seems like there's a lot of effort to poke holes in a roster that I think still has at worst the 2nd or 3rd most talent in the country.
+1

Year after year, Lars attracts lots of top talent to Charlottesville. I suppose UVA could get another difficult quarterfinal draw like it did in 2022, but Lars has made the Hoos a consistent top-5 program that every year has a realistic chance of winning it all.
joewillie78
Posts: 1260
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2018 10:21 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by joewillie78 »

DocBarrister wrote: Mon Jan 01, 2024 2:29 pm Virginia
Cornell
ND
and …

… Johns Hopkins.

DocBarrister 8-)
I'll sign up for this.
Gobigred
Joewillie78
DMac
Posts: 8925
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 10:02 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by DMac »

FannOLax wrote: Mon Jan 01, 2024 3:46 pm
HopFan16 wrote: Mon Jan 01, 2024 2:25 pm UVA should really have little to no concern about faceoffs. Ghobriel is good, probably top 10 in the country. And they are deeper there than they've been in awhile. They may not have a guy like LaSalla who's capable of taking over a game and scoring in bunches but as a unit they're going to be just fine, perhaps more than fine. Seems like there's a lot of effort to poke holes in a roster that I think still has at worst the 2nd or 3rd most talent in the country.
+1

Year after year, Lars attracts lots of top talent to Charlottesville. I suppose UVA could get another difficult quarterfinal draw like it did in 2022, but Lars has made the Hoos a consistent top-5 program that every year has a realistic chance of winning it all.
Agree. Don't know why you wouldn't want to play for Lars, I like the way he plays the game. Va's been real good.
cmbtp88
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2023 7:56 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by cmbtp88 »

HopFan16 wrote: Mon Jan 01, 2024 2:25 pm UVA should really have little to no concern about faceoffs. Ghobriel is good, probably top 10 in the country. And they are deeper there than they've been in awhile. They may not have a guy like LaSalla who's capable of taking over a game and scoring in bunches but as a unit they're going to be just fine, perhaps more than fine. Seems like there's a lot of effort to poke holes in a roster that I think still has at worst the 2nd or 3rd most talent in the country.
Agreed.
1766
Posts: 1234
Joined: Wed May 27, 2020 4:31 pm

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by 1766 »

Cornell
Uva
Rutgers
Penn State
GaitsRightHand
Posts: 488
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2022 7:43 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by GaitsRightHand »

UVA
Duke
ND
Cornell/MD
Dosadi
Posts: 36
Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2021 1:26 pm

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by Dosadi »

ND
Princeton
UVA
Duke
AreaLax
Posts: 2778
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:12 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by AreaLax »

Md
UVA
DUKE/PSU
HOPKINS/ND
RumorMill
Posts: 292
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2019 3:30 pm

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by RumorMill »

UVA
Army
Hopkins
Denver
MDralphie
Posts: 151
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2022 9:24 pm

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by MDralphie »

UVA
MD
DUKE
CORNELL
AreaLax
Posts: 2778
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 10:12 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by AreaLax »

USA LACROSSE DIVISION I MEN’S
PRESEASON TOP 20
1. Notre Dame
2. Duke
3. Virginia
4. Penn State
5. Maryland
6. Johns Hopkins
7. Cornell
8. Army
9. Syracuse
10. Yale
11. Denver
12. Georgetown
13. Michigan
14. Princeton
15. Rutgers
16. Delaware
17. Penn
18. Boston U
19. North Carolina
20. Richmond

Also considered (alphabetical order): Loyola, Marquette, Utah
Farfromgeneva
Posts: 22723
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 10:53 am

Re: Way too early Final Four

Post by Farfromgeneva »

coda wrote: Sat Dec 30, 2023 6:53 pm
Farfromgeneva wrote: Fri Dec 29, 2023 5:35 pm
coda wrote: Fri Dec 29, 2023 10:01 am
Farfromgeneva wrote: Thu Dec 28, 2023 10:46 pm
Mr3Putt wrote: Wed Dec 27, 2023 9:39 am So, ND is not a F4 team in 24’? Why not? Kavanugh, Entemann, along w transfers are back. Didn’t Penn st lose a lot? Army has to score to win in Quarters to advance…. Can they?
Not specific to you but how come I never see anyone mention this kid who had the game winner and is as valuable as anyone IMO incl Entemann and the Kavanaughs. And I think Teflon got credit for the impact of Dobson too much last spring.

https://fightingirish.com/roster/eric-dobson/

7,3,10 on 23 shots vs JHU, UVA & Duke in playoffs. Lefty with a hard shot from midfield. Inherited him on my sons fantasy team and they went as he went generally last year.
This is some of my personal bias showing, but the Kavanaugh's are a big reason Dobson isnt mentioned. When healthy, they tend to completely dominate the ball. The offense can get really stagnant with them.. Thought they are amazing at finding effort goals
But everyone immediately gave Tevlin credit and he’s a fine player but I think giving the kid who came from Cali (good but still learning curve at high end D1 for those kids) and lost his senior year to Covid and really elevated his Soph and Jr years. 34,11 on 32% and he shot 20% as a FR in 20-21. Entemann had a great playoffs but people’s are sleeping on the difference Dobson makes between being “the people’s champ” in 2022 and the champ in 23.
I think you mean Florida, if you are talking about Dobson
Yes sorry but point was a lost year for a kid coming from an area with less HS depth of comp.
Same sword they knight you they gon' good night you with
Thats' only half if they like you
That ain't even the half what they might do
Don't believe me, ask Michael
See Martin, Malcolm
See Jesus, Judas; Caesar, Brutus
See success is like suicide
Post Reply

Return to “D1 MENS LACROSSE”