Healthcare

The odds are excellent that you will leave this forum hating someone.
User avatar
Brooklyn
Posts: 9621
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 12:16 am
Location: St Paul, Minnesota

Re: Healthcare

Post by Brooklyn »

njbill wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:32 am When a vaccine is ready, hopefully in early 2021, it will be called the Biden vaccine. The Biden vaccine will be used to eradicate the Trump virus which has caused the Trump depression. Biden’s 2021 economic numbers will be yuuuge as he brings the country out of the Trump depression.
jhu72 wrote: Wed Jul 29, 2020 10:17 am … with the death toll now over 150K, 6+ months into this, it is time to change the name of the virus from coronavirus in the US, to the Trump virus. He owns it now and no thinking individual can think Trump's behavior has not contributed to the death toll!


Agree 100% with both truthful comments.
It has been proven a hundred times that the surest way to the heart of any man, black or white, honest or dishonest, is through justice and fairness.

Charles Francis "Socker" Coe, Esq
CU88
Posts: 4431
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: Healthcare

Post by CU88 »

Two weeks ago, Trump promised Chris Wallace he would sign a “full and complete” health care plan to replace Obamacare by tomorrow. Excited to see the details.

https://twitter.com/HelenKennedy/status ... 0405707778

I am sure that all of the r's here are excited for o d to come through for all americans here...
by cradleandshoot » Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:57 am
Mr moderator, deactivate my account.
You have heck this forum up to making it nothing more than a joke. I hope you are happy.
This is cradle and shoot signing out.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
CU88
Posts: 4431
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 4:59 pm

Re: Healthcare

Post by CU88 »

I guess the r's don't want to share the good news on the new o d plan???

Or maybe their hero o d is full of horse hockey? Could it be just another one of his lies that the r's cheer?

And he is the best that the r's have to offer for Nov 2020???

Trump keeps promising an overhaul of the nation’s health-care system that never arrives.

By Anne Gearan, Amy Goldstein and Seung Min Kim
August 2, 2020 at 6:00 a.m. EDT

It was a bold claim when President Trump said that he was about to produce an overhaul of the nation’s health-care system, at last doing away with the Affordable Care Act, which he has long promised to abolish.

“We’re signing a health-care plan within two weeks, a full and complete health-care plan,” Trump pledged in a July 19 interview with “Fox News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace.

Now, with the two weeks expiring Sunday, there is no evidence that the administration has designed a replacement for the 2010 health-care law. Instead, there is a sense of familiarity.

Repeatedly and starting before he took office, Trump has vowed that he is on the cusp of delivering a full-fledged plan to reshape the health-care system along conservative lines and replace the central domestic achievement of Barack Obama’s presidency.

No total revamp has ever emerged.


Trump’s latest promise comes amid the outbreak of the novel coronavirus, which has infected millions, caused more than 150,000 deaths and cost Americans their work and the health benefits that often come with jobs. His vow comes three months before the presidential election and at a time when Trump’s Republican allies in Congress may least want to revisit an issue that was a political loser for the party in the 2018 midterm elections.

Yet Trump has returned to the theme in recent days.

“We’re going to be doing a health-care plan. We’re going to be doing a very inclusive health-care plan. I’ll be signing it sometime very soon,” Trump said during an exchange with reporters at an event in Belleair, Fla., on Friday. When a reporter noted that he told Fox’s Wallace that he would sign it in two weeks, Trump added: “Might be Sunday. But it’s going to be very soon.”

Trump’s decision to revive a health-care promise that he has failed to deliver on — this time with less than 100 days before Election Day — carries political risks. Although it may appeal to voters who don’t like the ACA, it also highlights his party’s inability to come up with an alternative, despite spending almost a decade promising one.

It also raises questions about what exactly his plan would look like and whether it would cover fewer Americans than the current system as the pandemic ravages the country.

Nonetheless, some of Trump’s allies said floating health-care ideas is a smart move by the president.

Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (R-S.C.), who regularly meets and golfs with the president, said the health-care plan that Trump has referred to would come in the form of an executive order that Graham called “fairly comprehensive.” However broad, an executive order would fall short of a full legislative overhaul.

Graham said what Trump has in mind now would ensure that consumers do not risk losing their health plans if they get sick, but he did not give details.

“He’s pretty excited about it,” Graham said of the president. The ACA’s consumer protections for people with preexisting medical conditions is one its most popular facets with the public, and it is the one part of the law Trump consistently says he would preserve if he could get rid of the rest. How he could do that while containing costs after he and congressional Republicans remove the law’s requirement that everyone has to purchase health insurance remains the question.

Graham said it is politically astute for the White House to present an alternative to Democratic proposals close to the election, including the idea of Joe Biden, the party’s presumptive nominee, to build on the ACA so that more people could get coverage.

Still, senior Republican aides on Capitol Hill who are steeped in health care said they had little knowledge of any White House planning for a comprehensive replacement of the ACA.

The White House did not offer details or parse the president’s terminology, which has included saying that the forthcoming plan would be a bill. That implied legislation rather than an executive order.

“President Trump continues to act in delivering better and cheaper health care, protecting Americans with preexisting conditions, lowering prescription drug costs, and defending the right of Americans to keep their doctors and plans of their choice,” White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany said in a statement to The Washington Post.

McEnany pointed out that Trump issued four executive orders in late July intended to lower prescription drug prices. “There will be more action to come in the coming weeks,” she said without identifying any.

On Capitol Hill, the president’s promises of health plans and legal efforts by the administration to scrap the ACA have created dilemmas for some Republicans. Of the GOP senators facing competitive races this fall, only Susan Collins (Maine) has said that she opposes the Justice Department’s decision to back an effort to gut the law in the courts. Other Republicans have struggled to answer directly, walking a tightrope between embracing a position that would go against popular provisions in the health-care law and risking the wrath of conservatives who want Obamacare repealed.

And the pandemic has also only sharpened the relevance of health care in the eyes of voters — increasing Republican anxiety about doing anything that could limit coverage ahead of the election. Republican Sens. John Cornyn (Tex.), Dan Sullivan (Alaska), Steve Daines (Mont.) and Martha McSally (Ariz.) — all on the ballot this November — this past week drafted legislation that would provide assistance through COBRA for people who lose their employer-sponsored health care as jobs continue to vanish during the pandemic.

“I think there’s definitely things we need to do,” Cornyn said. “But I think our focus ought to be on giving people more choices.”

The ACA — politically polarizing throughout the decade it has existed — is favored by a slim majority of Americans. A Kaiser Family Foundation survey in July found that 51 percent support the law while 36 percent oppose it. A Fox News survey in June showed 56 percent support and 38 percent opposition.

For Trump, saying that he is about to produce a health-care plan to replace the ACA has become a recurrent mantra of his presidency.

During his 2016 campaign, condemning the law was central to Trump’s candidacy. During that campaign’s final days, Trump said he was so eager to repeal and replace the 2010 law that he might ask Congress to convene a special session to do it.

“It will be such an honor for me, for you and for everybody in this country,” the then-Republican nominee said, “because Obamacare has to be replaced. And we will do it, and we will do it very, very quickly.”

The ACA was a significant theme of the president’s joint address to Congress just over a month into his tenure. “Tonight I am calling on this Congress to repeal and replace Obamacare,” he said, calling for measures that would “expand choice, increase access, lower costs and, at the same time, provide better health care.”

With GOP majorities in both the House and the Senate, Congress devoted much of 2017 to trying to get rid of substantial parts of the law. But a succession of repeal bills ultimately faltered in the Senate. When the last one did, Trump said nothing.

Near the end of the year, Congress took one big whack at the health law. As part of a major change in tax law, it eliminated the penalty the ACA levied on most Americans if they failed to carry health insurance. The penalty’s end neutralized the law’s insurance mandate.

With little appetite after that among Senate Republicans to continue trying to gut the law, and a Democratic House majority a year later, the momentum for replacing the ACA fell back to the Trump administration. Cabinet departments have, by turns, undercut specific parts of the law and tried to have it invalidated in the courts, while emphasizing that their concern for the nation’s health-care system and America’s patients reaches beyond the ACA.

And the president? He has continued to periodically vow that he would come up with a better health plan.

In the fall of 2017, Trump took a major swipe at the law by ending payments to insurance companies that had helped them afford to offer lower-income customers discounts on their deductibles and other out-of-pocket costs, as the ACA requires.

During 2018, health officials sought to shrink the law in several other ways. They wrote rules that gave states greater latitude in defining a set of 10 “essential health benefits” that the ACA requires many health plans to cover. They widened the availability of short-term health plans — originally intended as bridge coverage when someone was, say, between jobs — that do not meet consumer protections or benefits that the law otherwise requires.

The administration has joined with a group of Republican attorneys general who are pursuing a lawsuit, now before the Supreme Court, that contends the entire ACA is unconstitutional. At first, the Justice Department argued that only part of the law is invalid, but the administration hardened its position to argue that the entire law should be thrown out.

As these and other administration health-care actions have played out, the drumbeat has continued that the president was about to reveal an ACA replacement plan.

In June 2019, Trump said in an interview with ABC News that he would announce a “phenomenal” new health-care plan “in about two months, maybe less.”

Two months later, White House counselor Kellyanne Conway told reporters that the president was preparing to introduce an elaborate plan to redesign the nation’s health-care system in a speech the following month. “We’re working every single day here,” Conway said last August. “I’ve already been in meetings this morning on the president’s health-care plan. It’s pretty impressive.”


No speech or plan came.

In June, Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar suggested that the administration would develop a health-care plan only if the nation’s highest court, which has upheld the law in two earlier cases over the past eight years, overturns it this time. “We’ll work with Congress on a plan if the ACA is struck down,” Azar said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” “We’ll see what the Supreme Court rules.”

That was three weeks before the president told Fox that he was about to issue a plan.

The administration’s antipathy toward the law has not produced much real-world change for the approximately 20 million people who have coverage through the insurance marketplaces the ACA created for those who cannot get affordable health benefits through a job and those insured through Medicaid expansions.

Early on, HHS slashed federal funding for advertising and other outreach efforts to encourage people to buy ACA health plans during the annual enrollment period. Critics of the administration predicted that sign-ups would ebb. They have not.

The most recent enrollment figures document the number of people choosing an ACA health plan who had followed up by paying insurance premiums last winter so their coverage was in place as of February. The figures, released last week, show that 10.7 million consumers have such plans, slightly more than the 10.6 million a year earlier.

Despite the administration’s steps to undercut parts of the law, and the elimination of the penalty for not having insurance, some of the ACA’s main features remain in place. They include federal subsidies for more than 8 in 10 people who buy health plans in the marketplaces created under the law, the expansion of Medicaid in most states, many consumer insurance protections, and a rule that young adults can stay on their parents’ insurance until they turn 26.

Against existing evidence, Trump says that will soon change.

“We’re getting rid of it because we’re going to replace it with something much better,” Trump told Wallace two weeks ago.

LIAR
by cradleandshoot » Fri Aug 13, 2021 8:57 am
Mr moderator, deactivate my account.
You have heck this forum up to making it nothing more than a joke. I hope you are happy.
This is cradle and shoot signing out.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
njbill
Posts: 6835
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 1:35 am

Re: Healthcare

Post by njbill »

Now that Jared has achieved peace in the Middle East (what? you missed that?) and solved the Covid pandemic (you missed that, too?), he has come up with a solution to the healthcare problem which has vexed the country for generations.
User avatar
dislaxxic
Posts: 4509
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 11:00 am
Location: Moving to Montana Soon...

Re: Healthcare

Post by dislaxxic »

Any of our Trumpublicon friends want to give us an update on the president's pending healthcare plan?

..
"The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog." - Calvin, to Hobbes
User avatar
dislaxxic
Posts: 4509
Joined: Thu May 10, 2018 11:00 am
Location: Moving to Montana Soon...

Re: Healthcare

Post by dislaxxic »

Yeah, i didn't think so. No trumpublicon wants to talk about healthcare.

Suit Challenging ACA Legally Suspect But Threatens Loss of Coverage for Tens of Millions

..
"The purpose of writing is to inflate weak ideas, obscure poor reasoning, and inhibit clarity. With a little practice, writing can be an intimidating and impenetrable fog." - Calvin, to Hobbes
User avatar
Brooklyn
Posts: 9621
Joined: Fri Aug 31, 2018 12:16 am
Location: St Paul, Minnesota

Re: Healthcare

Post by Brooklyn »

Image
It has been proven a hundred times that the surest way to the heart of any man, black or white, honest or dishonest, is through justice and fairness.

Charles Francis "Socker" Coe, Esq
runrussellrun
Posts: 7380
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am

Re: Healthcare

Post by runrussellrun »

Guess you liberal pretends and your drug pusher media didnt' cover this?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential ... care-plan/

and

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/24/trump-t ... lling.html

cue the, "...only b/c he wants to get re-elected" narrative, POTUSA tRump doesn't really mean it?
ILM...Independent Lives Matter
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
runrussellrun
Posts: 7380
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am

Re: Healthcare

Post by runrussellrun »

The Best political show discusses tRumps exec order on "pre existing" condidtions

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay_ZHMitgCI


but.....you don't watch. You love the twitter gossip garbage. you are what you eat.
ILM...Independent Lives Matter
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
njbill
Posts: 6835
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 1:35 am

Re: Healthcare

Post by njbill »

runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 1:12 pm Guess you liberal pretends and your drug pusher media didnt' cover this?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential ... care-plan/

and

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/24/trump-t ... lling.html

cue the, "...only b/c he wants to get re-elected" narrative, POTUSA tRump doesn't really mean it?
:lol: You know this EO is meaningless, right.

Just a political propaganda announcement to try to fool the voters.

As worthless as a three dollar bill.
runrussellrun
Posts: 7380
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am

Re: Healthcare

Post by runrussellrun »

njbill wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 3:12 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 1:12 pm Guess you liberal pretends and your drug pusher media didnt' cover this?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential ... care-plan/

and

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/24/trump-t ... lling.html

cue the, "...only b/c he wants to get re-elected" narrative, POTUSA tRump doesn't really mean it?
:lol: You know this EO is meaningless, right.

Just a political propaganda announcement to try to fool the voters.

As worthless as a three dollar bill.
ummmm........see my next post and watch/listen to the link.

In other words, if I didn't feel that EO's are meaningless, why would I, almost immediately, post a link mocking tRumps EO.

critical thinking has gone by by
ILM...Independent Lives Matter
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
runrussellrun
Posts: 7380
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 11:07 am

Re: Healthcare

Post by runrussellrun »

njbill wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 3:12 pm
runrussellrun wrote: Fri Sep 25, 2020 1:12 pm Guess you liberal pretends and your drug pusher media didnt' cover this?

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential ... care-plan/

and

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/09/24/trump-t ... lling.html

cue the, "...only b/c he wants to get re-elected" narrative, POTUSA tRump doesn't really mean it?
:lol: You know this EO is meaningless, right.

Just a political propaganda announcement to try to fool the voters.

As worthless as a three dollar bill.
now that you understand, (you did watch THE RISING link ? )

another piece of irony is that it points out the sillyness of people being all upset, when Trump removes one of Obamas EO, one useless order, over another. Unless, of course, you don't believe that they are worthless ;)

but, do I correctly recall......hmmmm.......hatefuly hypocrisy.....adrift
ILM...Independent Lives Matter
Pronouns: "we" and "suck"
User avatar
Kismet
Posts: 4440
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 6:42 pm

Re: Healthcare

Post by Kismet »

They should charge admission to these hearings soely on entertainment value of exposing these crooks publicly



Watch Rep. Katie Porter from CA eviscerate the former CEO of Celgene Pharma over his compensation and drug pricing of one of their cancer drups
Catbird
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2019 8:13 am

Re: Healthcare

Post by Catbird »

Katie Porter is a national treasure; if only there were more like her.
seacoaster
Posts: 8866
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2018 4:36 pm

Re: Healthcare

Post by seacoaster »

Catbird wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:14 am Katie Porter is a national treasure; if only there were more like her.
Agreed. And the hand-held white board is remarkably effective.
ardilla secreta
Posts: 2095
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 11:32 am
Location: Niagara Frontier

Re: Healthcare

Post by ardilla secreta »

Bob Murray, Who Fought Against Black Lung Regulations As A Coal Operator, Has Filed For Black Lung Benefits

Because health care and safe work environments are not for every American.

https://www.wvpublic.org/energy-environ ... m7PmxnRIP0
kramerica.inc
Posts: 6211
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:01 pm

Re: Healthcare

Post by kramerica.inc »

Where's aFan?
He would just consider this guy to be just like Biden- "listening to constituents and changing his mind."

:?
User avatar
holmes435
Posts: 2357
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2018 12:57 am

Re: Healthcare

Post by holmes435 »

"'I never thought leopards would eat MY face,' sobs man who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party."
a fan
Posts: 17723
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2018 9:05 pm

Re: Healthcare

Post by a fan »

kramerica.inc wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 1:08 pm Where's aFan?
He would just consider this guy to be just like Biden- "listening to constituents and changing his mind."

:?
:lol: Dude. You voted for a guy who said that Mexico would pay for a wall. And that China would pay for tariffs. Oh, and about 1,000 other lies.....and that's just in one week.

And yet you think we're supposed to get upset if Biden lies? :lol: Whoo. Good one.

And how many times do I need to remind you that I neither like, nor support Biden?
jhu72
Posts: 13883
Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2018 12:52 pm

Re: Healthcare

Post by jhu72 »

Catbird wrote: Thu Oct 01, 2020 8:14 am Katie Porter is a national treasure; if only there were more like her.
+1

I don't see how both sides of the aisle don't love her.
Image STAND AGAINST FASCISM
Post Reply

Return to “POLITICS”